JYOTI SINGH
Heetich Marketing-und – Appellant
Versus
Gupta Store – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral). - I.A. 8861/2022 (under Chapter XVA Rule 1 of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018 read with Section 151 of the CPC, by Plaintiffs)
1. Present application has been preferred on behalf of the Plaintiffs under Chapter XVA Rule 1 of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018 read with Section 151 CPC, 1908 for a summary judgment against the Defendant.
2. Issue notice.
3. Mr. Abhishek Saket, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Defendant and, on instructions, submits that Defendant has no objection to the application being allowed and the suit being decreed.
4. Present suit was filed by the Plaintiffs against the Defendant seeking to restrain the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiffs' trademarks
5. It is averred by the Plaintiffs that the trade name and trademark HETTICH owes its origin to its founding father, way back in the year 1888. Plaintiffs are a part of diversified group of companies, having operations in multiple countries across the world and engaged in manufacturing, marketing and selling furniture, fittings, door hinges, runners, etc., which has led to the said mark becoming distinctive of Plaintiffs' products and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.