SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1591

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Dinesh Kumar Sharma, JJ.
Jindal Realty Limited - Appellant
Versus
National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi - Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 6304 of 2022
Decided On : 20-04-2022

Advocates appeared:
Salil Kapoor, Advocate, Sumit Lalchandani, Advocate, Ananya Kapoor, Advocate, S.K.Gambhir, Advocate, Ajit Sharma, Advocate

Violation of the principle of natural justice and mandatory procedure under the 'Faceless assessment Scheme' and Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 renders the assessment order, demand notice, and penalty proceedings liable to be set aside.

Headnote:

Violation of Natural Justice - Faceless Assessment - The court set aside the impugned assessment order, demand notice, and penalty proceedings due to the violation of the principle of natural justice and mandatory procedure prescribed under the 'Faceless assessment Scheme' and Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Fact of the Case:

The writ petition challenged the assessment order, demand notice, and penalty notice dated 19th March, 2022 for the assessment Year 2016-17, citing the lack of issuance of a draft assessment order and show cause notice prior to the assessment order.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the absence of prior show cause notice and draft assessment order constituted a violation of the principle of natural justice and the mandatory procedure prescribed under the 'Faceless assessment Scheme' and Section 144B of the act. It set aside the impugned assessment order, demand notice, and penalty proceedings, remanding the matter back to the assessing Officer for compliance with the statutory procedure.

Issues: The issues revolved around the denial of a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner due to the absence of a draft assessment order and show cause notice prior to the assessment order, and the maintainability of the writ petition in light of the availability of an appellate remedy.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the violation of principles of natural justice rendered the writ petition maintainable, despite the availability of an appellate remedy. It emphasized the mandatory nature of the procedure prescribed under the 'Faceless assessment Scheme' and Section 144B of the act, requiring the issuance of a show cause notice and draft assessment order before issuing a final assessment order.

Final Decision: The impugned assessment order, demand notice, and penalty proceedings were set aside, and the matter was remanded back to the assessing Officer for compliance with the statutory procedure.

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J . - C.M.No.18988/2022

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) No.6304/2022 & C.M.No.18987/2022

1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the assessment order dated 19th March, 2022 passed under Section 147 read with section 144B of the Income Tax act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') as well as the demand notice and penalty notice both dated 19th March, 2022 for the assessment Year 2016-17. Petitioner further seeks a direction to restrain the respondent from giving effect to/proceed further pursuant to the impugned assessment order, the demand notice as well as penalty notice all dated 19th March, 2022.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Respondent did not issue any draft assessment order and show cause notice under Section 144B(xvi)(b) of the act to the Petitioner prior to passing the impugned assessment order dated 19th March, 2022. He states that as a consequence, the Petitioner has been denied a reasonable opportunity of hearing.

3. Issue notice. Mr.ajit Sharma, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Respondent. He states that present writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioner has an alternative effective remedy by filing an appeal.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that once the assessment has been carried out by respondent No. 1-National Faceless assessment Centre, Delhi, it has to be in accordance with the statutory procedure prescribed for assessment by the said authority and cannot be in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the earlier regime.

6. This Court is also of the view that Section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) mandatorily provides for issuance of a show cause notice and draft assessment order before issuing a final assessment order. The relevant portion of Section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) of the act is reproduced hereinbelow:

    '144B. Faceless assessment -

    (1) xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx

    (xvi) the National Faceless assessment Centre shall examine the draft assessment order in accordance with the risk management strategy specified by the Board, including by way of an automated examination tool, whereupon it may decide to-

    xxxx xxxx xxxx

    (b) provide an opportunity to the assessee, in case any variation prejudicial to the interest of assessee is proposed, by serving a notice calling upon him to show cause as to why the proposed variation should not be made;..'

    7. In the present case, as no prior show cause notice as well as draft assessment order had been issued, there is a violation of principle of natural justice as well as mandatory procedure prescribed under 'Faceless assessment Scheme' and as stipulated in Section 144B of the act.

    8. It is a settled law that when there is a violation of principles of natural justice, the availability of an appellate remedy does not operate as a bar to the maintainability of the writ petition.

    9. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the impugned assessment order issued under Section 147 read with Section 144B, demand notice under Section 156 and penalty proceedings initiated under Section 271(1)(c) of the act, all dated 19th March, 2022 are set aside and the matter is remanded back to the assessing Officer, who shall issue a show cause notice as well as draft assessment order to the petitioner and thereafter pass a reasoned order in accordance with law.

    10. With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition along with pending application stands disposed of. This Court clarifies that it has not commented on the merits of the controversy. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top