SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1526

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Talwant Singh, J.
Ramesh Kumar Uppal - Appellant
Versus
M/s Matra Chayya Exports & Ors. - Respondents
Transfer Petition (Criminal) No. 9 of 2022
Decided On : 15-03-2022

Advocates appeared:
Abdullah Tanveer, Advocate

The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of jurisdictional provisions in determining the appropriate court for filing a complaint case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Headnote:

Jurisdiction - Transfer of Complaint Case - The court ordered the transfer of a complaint case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act from one district to another based on the jurisdictional provisions of the Act.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a complaint case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in a court that was found to lack jurisdiction due to the location of the payee bank. The petitioner sought the transfer of the case to a court with the appropriate jurisdiction.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the complaint should have been filed in the court under whose jurisdiction the payee bank was situated, as per the provisions of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It ordered the transfer of the case to the Court of learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate in the North District, Rohini Courts Complex, New Delhi.

Issues: Jurisdictional issue regarding the filing of the complaint case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in a court lacking jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of Section 138(2)(a) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which stipulate that the offence under Section 138 shall be inquired into and tried only by a court within whose local jurisdiction the payee bank is situated.

Final Decision: The court ordered the transfer of the complaint case from the court lacking jurisdiction to the Court of learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate in the North District, Rohini Courts Complex, New Delhi, and disposed of the petition with this direction.

JUDGMENT

Talwant Singh, J. - The petitioner has filed this present petition under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to 'Cr. P.C.') seeking transfer of complaint case bearing CC no. 433/2021 titled as 'Ramesh Kumar Uppal vs. Matra Chayya Exports & Ors' under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to 'NI act'). The transfer of the said complaint case has been sought from the Court of Sh. Devanshu Sajlan, learned Metropolitan Magistrate (MM), West District, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi to the Court of competent jurisdiction in North District, Rohini Court Complex, New Delhi.

2. The background of the case is that the respondent availed friendly loan of Rs.50.00 lacs from petitioner in the year 2017 and as a part discharge of his liability he had issued a cheque bearing no.717566 drawn on Yes Bank, Paschim Encalve, Peeragarhi Chowk, New Delhi-110087 amounting to Rs.27,92,650/-. The petitioner deposited the said cheque in his bank account maintained with the Corporation Bank, Model Town, New Delhi for encashment. This cheque was returned dishonoured vide return memo dated 15.09.2020. a legal notice was issued to the respondent on 30.09.2020, to which a false and frivolous reply was sent on 07.10.2020 with a view to avoid the liability by the respondent.

3. The petitioner filed a complaint case bearing no. 433/2021 on 09.11.2020 in West District at Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. On 27.11.2021 at the pre-cognizance stage, it was observed by the trial court that it did not have the jurisdiction to try the complaint case as the 'payee bank' was situated in North District, hence the accused could not be summoned. In these circumstances, it has been prayed as under:

    '(a) allow the present application & direct the transfer of Complaint Case No. 433/2021 titled as 'Ramesh Kumar Uppal vs. Matra Chayya Exports & Ors. filed by the Petitioner under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument act, from the court of Sh. Devanshu Sajlan, Learned Metropolitan Magistrate, West District, Tis Hazari Court, New Delhi to the competent court of Learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate North District Rohini Court, New Delhi';

    4. The respondents are yet to be summoned, there is no need to issue notice to them.

    5. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The relevant provision in this regard is Section 142 (2) (a) of N I act, which is reproduced hereunder:.

      '(2) The offence under section 138 shall be inquired into and tried only by a court within whose local jurisdiction,-

      (a) if the cheque is delivered for collection through an account, the branch of the bank where the payee or holder in due course, as the case may be, maintains the account, is situated; or

      (b) if the cheque is presented for payment by the payee or holder in due course, otherwise through an account, the branch of the drawee bank where the drawer maintains the account, is situated.

      Explanation- For the purposes of clause (a), where a cheque is delivered for collection at any branch of the bank of the payee or holder in due course, then, the cheque shall be deemed to have been delivered to the branch of the bank in which the payee or holder in due course, as the case may be, maintains the account.' (Emphasis supplied)

      6. It is evident that the present complaint ought to have been filed in the Court under whose jurisdiction the bank of the payee, i.e., petitioner is situated. The bank of the payee is situated at Model Town-III, Delhi, which falls in the North District and the courts of the said district are situated at Rohini Courts Complex, New Delhi.

      7. apparently, the Court of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in West District does not have the jurisdiction to try the complaint in question, which was filed due to bona fide belief in a District Court, which has no jurisdiction.

      8. In view of the above, it is hereby ordered that criminal complaint bearing CC No. 433/2021 tilted 'Ramesh Kumar Uppal vs. Matra Chayya Exports & Ors' under S

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top