IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Atul Dhariya - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 13697 of 2021
Decided On : 06-01-2022
Employment - Indian Coast Guard Recruitment - Advertisement No. 02/2021 - Paragraph 12(r) - Failure to regularly check e-mail and ICG website - Cancellation of candidature
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner applied for the post of Navik (GD) in the Indian Coast Guard for the 02/2021 batch. After being provisionally failed during document verification, he was later declared as 'pass' for Stage - II but failed to report for Stage - III recruitment process due to alleged lack of intimation from the respondents.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's failure to regularly check his e-mail and the ICG website, as prescribed in the advertisement, led to the non-reporting for the recruitment stages, and consequently, the cancellation of his candidature. The court also noted that the training had already commenced, and no relief could be granted to the petitioner at this belated stage.
Issues: The issues revolved around the petitioner's alleged lack of intimation for clearing Stage - II recruitment process and his subsequent inability to report for Stage - III recruitment process, and the respondents' adherence to the communication mode prescribed in the advertisement.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner's lack of vigilance in checking his e-mail and the ICG website, as required by the advertisement, and his failure to report for the recruitment stages, led to the dismissal of the petition. The court also emphasized that the burden of communication cannot be shifted to the respondents and that no special equities were created in favor of the petitioner by the earlier provisional failure.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and no costs were awarded to the petitioner.
JUDGMENT
Navin Chawla, J. - The petition has been heard by way of video-conferencing.
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a direction to the respondents to allow him to join at INS Chilka and consider him in further enrolment/recruitment process.
2. The petitioner had applied for the post of Navik (GD) in the Indian Coast Guard (in short, 'ICG') for the 02/2021 batch. The petitioner cleared the Stage - I recruitment process successfully. The petitioner was thereafter called for the Physical Fitness Test, which also he successfully completed. However, on examination of his documents, the Recruitment Board declared him as not qualified and failed him on account of some issue with his Caste Certificate. The petitioner states that thereafter he checked his application status online on the portal and the same showed 'Invalid Credentials'.
3. The petitioner claims that in the month of august 2021, his phone was damaged and he did not have money to get it repaired as he belongs to a humble background. For this reason, he was not able to check his result, which was declared and uploaded by the respondents on the website on 12.08.2021. The petitioner further claims that on 14.08.2021 he received an e-mail from the Recruitment Directorate that his case has been re-examined and his documents have been found to be in order and that he has cleared the Stage - II recruitment process. The petitioner claims that as he was unaware of his clearing of the Stage - II recruitment process, he could not report at INS Chilka for the Stage - III recruitment process on 27.08.2021, as directed. The petitioner states that he was unable to report for the Stage - III recruitment process due to negligence and communication gap from the respondents' end as no intimation was given to the petitioner through a text message or through a postal communication of his clearing the Stage - II recruitment process. Such intimation was given only through e-mail, which the petitioner was unable to check because he was using the basic-feature phone and surviving on limited resources.
4. The petitioner claims that he then received an e-mail dated 08.09.2021 from the Recruitment Directorate seeking reason(s) why he had not reported to INS Chilka. He thereafter got his phone repaired on 13.09.2021 and checked his e-mail on 14.09.2021, when he came to know that he had to report at INS Chilka by 27.08.2021. The petitioner claims that he reported at the Headquarters in Noida, on 15.09.2021, when he was asked to report at INS Chilka with all his documents and the police verification report. The petitioner got his police verification conducted and reported at INS Chilka on 21.09.2021 and regularly thereafter, however, he was not allowed to enter the facility or meet any official. On 29.09.2021, the petitioner also submitted a written application to the Commanding Officer at INS Chilka, explaining his inability to report at an earlier stage. The petitioner claims that he cannot be denied employment for the fault of the respondents who had earlier declared him as 'failed' during the verification of the documents, which was later found to be incorrect, thereby declaring him successful in the Stage - II recruitment process, however, intimation thereof was not properly given to the petitioner.
5. On the other hand, the respondent no. 3, in its counter affidavit, has stated that the petitioner was only provisionally failed at Stage - II examination by the Recruitment Board during the verification of the documents at Noida, on 29.06.2021, with a direction to check the final result on his login ID when the results are declared on the ICG website. The petitioner was declared 'pass' for Stage - II during the final scrutiny of the documents by the ICG prior to issuing the E-admit Card for the Stage - III recruitment process and the same was informed to the petitioner vide e-mail dated 14.08.2021 with a direction to check his result on the ICG website. The petitioner, ho
Failure to comply with the prescribed mode of communication and non-reporting for recruitment stages may lead to the cancellation of candidature, and the burden of communication cannot be shifted to ....
Candidates have a responsibility to remain vigilant about communication from recruitment authorities to avoid missing important notifications, as outlined in the recruitment guidelines.
No deviation from the terms and conditions of the advertisement and rules for the recruitment would be permitted.
Strict adherence to recruitment application requirements is essential to maintain integrity and fairness; candidates cannot be excused from disqualification due to inadvertent errors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of the respondents to comply with principles of natural justice, provide equal opportunities to candidates, and consider peculiar fa....
The possession of the required qualification and meeting the eligibility criteria at the time of examination outweighed the mismatch in the online application details, leading to the court's directio....
Minor discrepancies in recruitment documents should not lead to disqualification if no malafide intent is present, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach in administrative processes.
The main legal point established is that there was no absolute obligation on the respondent to communicate through both email and phone number, and fair opportunities were given to the petitioner for....
Delay and laches in communicating inability to report for recruitment process can bar a petitioner from obtaining relief, especially when there is an ongoing recruitment process.
Timely communication and participation in recruitment processes are essential, and failure to do so can result in dismissal based on delay and laches.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.