NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Jindal Drilling And Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Naresh Kumar Agarwal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Neena Bansal Krishna, J. -
I.A. 11509/2021
1. An application under Order XI Rule 21 Read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'CPC') has been filed on behalf of the defendant no. 1 for dismissal of the suit of the plaintiff for non-production of the documents as directed by the Court.
2. The plaintiff has filed a suit for recovery of ?14,92,00,000/- and for rendition of accounts. The defendant has stated that this Court vide Order dated 26th September, 2019 allowed the I.A. No. 11042/2019 under Order XI Rule 12 CPC filed by defendant no. 1 with the following directions:
'The plaintiff to file affidavit with respect to the documents of which discovery is sought, within one month from today. The documents, possession and custody of which is admitted, be filed along with the said affidavit'
3. It is submitted that out of 33 documents mentioned in the said application, the plaintiff has filed only 11 documents, that too photocopies, and blatantly refused/neglected to file remaining documents by taking totally baseless, untenable and impermissible pleas. The plaintiff has failed to file the documents, possession and custody of which is ex
Babbar Sewing Machine Company vs. Trilok Nath Mahajan (1978) 4 SCC 188
Chandan Lal Jour Vs. Amin Chand Mohan Lal and Ors. AIR 1960 P&H 500
Chinnappain vs. Ram Chandran AIR 1989 Mad 314
Lajpat Rai Vs. TejBhan and Ors. AIR 1957 P&H 14
Union Bank of India and Ors. Vs. Hemantlal Ranchhodbhai Vegad AIR 1991 GUJ 113
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.