SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 224

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Sh. Anurag Sharma & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 3381 of 2020
Decided On : 16-01-2023

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rajeshwar K. Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Shadan Farasat, ASC, GNCTD with Mr. Shourya Dasgupta, Advocate, Mr. Manmeet Singh Arora and Ms. Jasbir Kaur, Advocates, Mr. Vikas Gupta, and Mr. Sohil Sharma, Advocates

Headnote:

Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Section 20 - Housing society - Incorrectly registered - ITD Society has been incorrectly registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860 though it is a cooperative group housing society – Held, It is clear that Registrar of Societies has already issued notice taking action in terms of complaint filed by Petitioners - A detailed reply to said notice has already been filed by ITD Society through its president - In view of fact that Registrar of Societies has already issued notice to ITD society and reply of ITD society has been received, stand of Petitioners shall be considered by Registrar of Societies and action shall be taken in accordance with law on complaint received qua ITD Society - Petition disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

Prathiba M. Singh, J.

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The Petitioners, who are the members of ITD Homes Welfare Society (hereinafter, “ITD Society”), have filed the present petition against the Respondents i.e. the Govt. of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD) - Registrar of Societies, the Commissioner - Delhi Police, Delhi Development Authority (DDA), the ITD Society and, various office bearers of the ITD Society

3. The reliefs sought in this petition are as under:

    “a) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of quo-warranto or certiorari or mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of case thereby directing the respondent No. 1 for winding up the illegally & unconstitutional society i.e. the respondent No. 3 namely “ITD Homes Welfare Society" which was registered with it under the Societies Registration Act XXI of 1860, vide registration No. S/1671/SDM/NW/2013 on 18.06.2013, contrary to the provisions of Section 20 of the said Act;

b) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of quo-warranto or certiorari or mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of case thereby directing the respondent No. 1 that after taking steps for winding up the respondent No. 3 Society, the amount deposited by the petitioners be returned to them;

c) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of quo-warranto or certiorari or mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of case thereby directing the respondent No. 2 to investigate into the criminal cases & FIR No. 61/2019 registered with it and prosecute against the respondent No. 4 to 10 and all other persons involved in the illegal activities, in a time bound manner;

d) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of quo-warranto or certiorari or mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of case thereby directing the respondent Nos. 1 & 2 to place the action taken reports before this Hon'ble Court for kind perusal and to pass further necessary orders & directions as may be required in the circumstances of the case from time to time; AND

e) pass such other and further orders in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents as may be deemed necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

4. The case of the Petitioners is that the ITD Society has been incorrectly registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 though it is a cooperative group housing society. It could have at best been registered under the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003. Further, it is submitted that there is large-scale mismanagement in the said society. The Petitioners on 5th August, 2019 filed a complaint against the ITD Society before the Registrar of Societies. However, it is submitted by the Petitioners that no action has been take any action till date.

5. A specific question was raised, as recorded in the order dated 14th January, 2021 passed by this Court, as to how the present writ petition would be maintainable. Today, Mr. Gupta ld. Counsel for the Petitioner has pointed out that in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of, the Registrar of Societies the following stand has been taken:

    “6. It is further submitted that the aforementioned representations do not make any allegation that the Respondent No.3 Society was illegally registered by the Answering Respondent. However, since the Respondent No.3 Society prima facie appears to be functioning as a Group Housing Society, a notice dated 18.06.2020 has been sent to the Respondent No.3 by the Answering Respondent. A reply dated 23.06.2020 was received from the Respondent No.3 Society on 25.06.2020, and is being examined. It is respectfully submitted that the Answering Respondent shall take appropriate action under law including inter alia de-registration of the Respondent No.3 Society should it be concluded that the Respondent No.3 was indeed a Group Housing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top