SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1647

IN THE HIGH COURT OF Himachal PRADESH, SHIMLA
AJAY MOHAN GOEL, J.
Sh. Joginder Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & others – Respondents
CWP No.4526 of 2025
Decided On : 28-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Abhay Kant Mishra, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General.

Societies Registration Act limits registration to specific non-service purposes; employee/volunteer welfare associations for grievances and service conditions against employer ineligible, irrespective of departmental No Objection Certificate.

Headnote:(A) Himachal Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2006 - Section 1(3) - Act applies to societies formed for specified purposes including promotion of science, education, literature, fine arts, diffusion of knowledge, social welfare, religious or charitable purposes, etc. - Proposed association by volunteers for promoting welfare, addressing grievances, representing legitimate interests, and espousing service conditions against employer does not fall within these purposes and cannot be registered under the Act, irrespective of No Objection Certificate from department. Registrar need not require NOC for societies conforming to Act's purposes as they have no relation to employer-employee issues. (Paras 7-10, 13-20, 23-24)

(B) Distinction between employee or volunteer associations formed as platform to raise grievances with employer and societies registrable under Act - Former not governed by Act even if termed 'society'; registration under Act confined to specified non-service related objects; recognition of such associations by employer governed by separate departmental rules. (Paras 7, 20, 22-23)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner, serving as volunteer utilized for maintaining law and order, along with colleagues resolved to form association for welfare, grievance redressal, and representation of interests of such volunteers. Registration application refused citing inappropriate occupation details, departmental objections, need for No Objection Certificate; certificate denied per central instructions prohibiting recognition of such associations.

Findings of Court:
Petition disposed with direction to approach Registrar with aims strictly conforming to Section 1(3) of Act, excluding service issues.

Issues: Whether objectives of proposed association qualify for registration under Societies Registration Act; propriety of refusing registration and insisting on No Objection Certificate.

Ratio Decidendi: Court held complete misappreciation by parties; Act does not contemplate registration of associations for service-related welfare and grievances of employees/volunteers; such groups stand distinct from registrable societies; NOC irrelevant for non-qualifying proposals.

Result: Petition disposed of.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks quashing of refusals for society registration. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. volunteers entitled to society; policy bars home guards association. (Para 4 , 5)
3. distinction between grievance associations and statutory societies. (Para 6 , 7)
4. 2006 act limits societies to enumerated welfare purposes. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
5. service grievances outside 2006 act's permitted objects. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
6. employment-related associations ineligible under societies act. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
7. no noc for compliant societies; recognition employer issue. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
8. register only if objects match act's section 1(3). (Para 24)

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Mohan Goel, J.

By way of this petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:-

“1. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned orders/communications dated 16.02.2024, and 24.10.2024, refusing N.O.C. and registration of Association;
2. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to process and grant the registration of the Petitioner’s Association under the Himachal Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2006.”

2. The case of the petitioner is that he is serving as Home Guard and is the President of a proposed Society of Home Guards, i.e. Home Guards Welfare Association, Himachal Pradesh. According to the petitioner, he alongwith his colleagues in a General Meeting held on 28.06.2024, through a Resolution, proposed to form an Association in the name and style of Home Guards Welfare Association, Himachal Pradesh. The objective of the Association was promoting welfare, addressing grievances and representing the legitimate interests of the Home Guards in Himachal Pradesh. The application for registration was submitted in the Office of Registrar of Societies on 04.08.2023. Vide letter dated 16.02.2024 (Annexure P-3), the request for registration of the Society was refused. It was further mentioned in the communication that subscribers of the Memorandum of Association, who were intending to form and register the Association had stated their occupation as agriculturists, which was inappropriate as services of Home Guards in the State are generally utilized for maintaining law and order. It was further mentioned in the communication that objections were raised by the Police Department in a similar case regarding the registration of Himachal Pradesh Police Welfare Association, citing that such Association was not permissible under the Police Act. It was also mentioned in the communication that in order to avoid any potential complication and litigation at a later stage, the subscribers of the Memorandum of Association were advised to take No Objection Certificate/ permission from the concerned Administrative Department to become elective office bearers of the proposed Association, provided there is no restriction in the Himachal Pradesh Home Guards Act, 1968 to form an Association by the Home Guard, as stated by the Police Department. It was also mentioned in the communication that clarifications regarding the status of the subscribers as to whether they were serving Government servants or agriculturists shall also be obtained.

3. According to the petitioner, feeling aggrieved by Annexure P-3, he through a Lawyer obtained information under the Right to Information Act whether the Home Guards were volunteers or Government servants. Said information was sought on 10.03.2024. In response thereto, though copies of rules and instructions were provided, but no reply was given to the query. In the petition, a reference has also been given of previous writ petition filed by the petitioner for registration of the Association as a Society and the representations made by the petitioner in this behalf to the Registrar of Societies on 23.08.2024 as well as representations submitted to Additional Director General-cum-Commandant General, Home Guards, Himachal Pradesh for issuance of a No Objection Certificate. The No
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top