SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 300

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, SATISH CHANDRA SHAMAR, JJ.
NEHA KAPOOR – Petitioner
Versus
MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 4319 of 2021
Decided On : 24-01-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Neha Kapoor.
For the Respondents: Shiva Lakshmi, Srishti Rawat, Ms. Ridhima Malhotra.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1949 – Article 226 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Information Technology Act, 2000 – Section 87, 2 – Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules, 2011 – Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 – Cinematograph Act, 1952 – Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 – Power of High Court to issue certain writs – Definitions – Power of Central Government to make rules – Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed by Petitioner for a direction to Respondents to constitute a Regulatory Authority censor board to censor review non-film songs, their lyrics and videos which are made available to general public through various media platforms like Television – Held, Directing for appointment of a regulatory authority would result in legislation by this Court which is not permissible – Separation of powers between legislature, judiciary and executive has been laid down in various judgments by Apex Court – Courts cannot mandate a statute or add provisions to a Statute as it would amount to legislation which is not permissible in constitutional scheme of this country – Courts do not possess power to set up an adjudicatory committee or a tribunal by way of issuing a writ of mandamus role of judiciary is primarily only to test legality of a statute and not to amend modify a statute – Setting up of tribunals authorities, regulators come purely within the domain of legislature and not in the domain of Courts – Writ Petition is dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

1. The instant Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the Petitioner for a direction to the Respondents herein to constitute a Regulatory Authority/censor board to censor/review the non-film songs, their lyrics and videos which are made available to the general public through various media platforms like Television, YouTube, etc. and make it mandatory for composers of non-film songs to receive certification before such songs are made available in public domain. Petitioner also seeks a direction to Respondent No. 2 herein to constitute a body to screen every non-film song and its contents, including lyrics and video, before they are released on the internet through any platform/application and to ban all such non-film songs available on the internet having obscene/vulgar content with immediate effect.

2. Notice was issued in the matter on 07.04.2021 and counter affidavit has been filed.

3. The Union of India in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1), clauses (z) and (zg) of sub-section (2) of Section 87 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as “the IT Act‘) and in supersession of the Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules‘) has brought out the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (hereinafter referred to as “the Ethics Code‘). The Ethics Code lays down a regimen to be followed by every intermediary. An intermediary has been defined under Section 2(w) of the IT Act and the same reads as under:

    2. (w) “intermediary” with respect to any particular electronic message means any person who on behalf of another person receives, stores or transmits that message or provides any service with respect to that message.”

4. Significant Social Media Intermediary and Social Media Intermediary has been defined under Sections 2(v) and 2(w) respectively of the Ethics Code and the same reads as under:

    “2......

(v) “Significant social media intermediary” means a social media intermediary having number of registered users in India above such threshold as notified by the Central Government.

(w) “Social media intermediary” means an intermediary which primarily or solely enables online interaction between two or more users and allows them to create, upload, share, disseminate, modify or access information using its services.”

5. Section 3 of the Ethics Code lays down the due diligence that is to be followed by all the intermediaries and the same reads as under:

    “3. (1) Due diligence by an intermediary: An intermediary, including social media intermediary and significant social media intermediary, shall observe the following due diligence while discharging its duties, namely:

(a) the intermediary shall prominently publish on its website, mobile based application or both, as the case may be, the rules and regulations, privacy policy and user agreement for access or usage of its computer resource by any person.

(b) the rules and regulations, privacy policy or user agreement of the intermediary shall inform the user of its computer resource not to host, display, upload, modify, publish, transmit, store, update or share any information that:

(i) belongs to another person and to which the user does not have any right.

(ii) is defamatory, obscene, pornographic, paedophilic, invasive of another privacy, including bodily privacy, insulting or harassing on the basis of gender, libellous, racially or ethnically objectionable, relating or encouraging money laundering or gambling, or otherwise inconsistent with or contrary to the laws in force.

(iii) is harmful to child.

(iv) infringes any patent, trademark, copyright or other proprietary rights.

(v) violates any law for the time being in force.

(vi) deceives or misleads the addressee about the origin of the message or knowingly and intentionally communicates any information which is patently false or misleading in nature but may re

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top