SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1779

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Satish Chandra Sharma, Subramonium Prasad, JJ.
Ravi M Nair, Dr. & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
Union Of India & Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 7374 of 2020 & CM Appl. 24719 of 2020, 39304 of 2021, 39305 of 2021, 39341 of 2021 & 39342 of 2021
Decided On : 01-11-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Suvidutt M.S., Ms. Somlagna Biswas, Mr. Chandy Oommen., for the Petitioner; Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Danish Faraz Khan, Advocate., for the Respondent; Ms. Isha Thkur with Mr. Sunil Narula, Advs., for the Respondent No. 2

The government and expert bodies have the authority to decide and approve medical protocols, especially in pandemic scenarios.

Headnote:

Homoeopathic Medicines - COVID-19 Treatment - Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 - Homoeopathy Central Council Act, 1973 - National Medical Commission Act, 2019

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners filed a Writ Petition seeking the inclusion of Homoeopathic medicines for the treatment of COVID-19 infections. The respondents argued that the petitioners were permitted to undertake research for COVID-19 through the Homoeopathy system but failed to follow the necessary procedures and obtain approvals.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the expert bodies and statutory bodies are best suited to decide and approve medical protocols. It emphasized that the government's decision in pandemic scenarios is based on expert opinions and should be left to the discretion of the government.

Issues: The issues revolved around the inclusion of Homoeopathic medicines for COVID-19 treatment, the petitioners' failure to follow necessary procedures for research, and the government's authority in deciding medical protocols.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the decision on which protocol to validate for pandemic control should be left to the discretion of the government and expert bodies. It also emphasized the importance of following statutory provisions and obtaining necessary permissions for conducting clinical trials.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the Writ Petition, stating that there was no reason to grant the relief prayed for by the petitioners at that juncture. However, it allowed the petitioners to conduct research and drug trials strictly in accordance with the law.

JUDGMENT

1. The Petitioners before this Court have filed this present Writ Petition by way of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) for issuance of appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent Union of India and its functionaries to notify Homoeopathic medicines of Arsenicum album - Phosphorus - Tuberculinum (APT) in series intervention protocol to prevent COVID-19 infections, and to allow Homoeopathic treatment of COVID-19 mild cases with Homoeopathic medicines standalone and added therapy in severe to critical cases.

2. The Petitioners in short are praying for issuance of writ of Mandamus to Government of India for including Homoeopathic medicines for treatment of COVID-19 infections. The Petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:

    '9.1 Issue direction to the Ministry of AYUSH to notify Arsenicum album - Phosphorus - Tuberculinum (APT) in series intervention protocol as second advisory supplementing the first advisory Arsenicum album 30 C as preventive for COVID - 19 on urgent basis;

    9.2 Issue direction to the Government of India to allow homoeopathic practitioners to treat mild cases of COVID- 19 by homoeopathic medicines, and for severe cases to critical cases as add-on therapy with allopathic medicine in hospitals if desired by the patient and/ or the party;

    9.3 Issue direction to the CCRH, the Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India to undertake the clinical trial on Arsenicum album- Phosphorus - Tuberculinum (APT) in series intervention protocol to preventCOVID-19 immediately and to complete it within a fixed time frame and also to concerned six State Governments for allowing and supporting to conduct the same as approved by the Task Force and CCRH;

    9.4 Issue directions to CCRH to prepare homoeopathic nosode from SARS-CoV2 on urgent basis in collaboration with other scientific organizations;

    9.5 Issue directions to the Government of India to publish advisory in this regard to be followed by all the State Governments and Union Territories of India;

    9.6 Pass any such other order(s) as may be deemed appropriate and fit in the circumstances of the present case.'

    3. The Respondents have filed a reply in the matter and various status reports have also been filed from time to time. The Respondent No.2 Central Counsel for Research in Homoeopathy (hereinafter referred to as 'CCRH') has filed a counter-affidavit, and it has been stated that the Writ Petition is a blatantly dishonest attempt on the part of the Petitioners to over reach the law.

    4. It has been stated that the Respondent No.2 CCRH is an autonomous body under the Ministry of Ayush, Government of India, and during the COVID-19 Pandemic, the Respondent No.1 Ministry of Ayush invited proposals/ suggestions for identifying potential preventive and therapeutic approaches from Ayush Systems for different stages of treatment of COVID-19 as standalone and/or add-on interventions to conventional care. It has also been stated that large number of proposals were received, and they were scanned by respective Central Research Councils for their validation and recommendation and for further action.

    5. It has been further stated that the Ministry of Ayush has issued a notification dated 21.04.2020 which facilitates undertaking research by scientists/ researchers/ clinicians or any recognized system of medicine under the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970, the Homoeopathy Central Council Act, 1973 and the National Medical Commission Act, 2019.

    6. It has been stated that the Petitioners were well aware of the notification issued on 21.04.2022 which certainly permitted the Petitioners and other persons to undertake the research for COVID-19 through Homoeopathy system including prophylactic measures.

    7. It has also been stated that the Petitioners were certainly at a liberty to undertake trails for the COVID-19 following the guidelines framed on the subject. The proposal of the Petitioners was accepted in principle and communicated to them vide letter dated 01.06.2020.

    8.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top