Back
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
Mohd. Hakim – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by the appellant and the state. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis on the bail application and principles of speedy trial. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 4. court's decision to grant bail based on the right to a speedy trial. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 5. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 40 , 41) |
JUDGMENT
Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J.
Brief Background
The appellant is an accused facing trial in cases arising from FIR Nos. 130/2008, 166/2008, 293/2008, 418/2008, and 419/2008 dated 13.09.2008 all of which now stand transferred to P.S.: Special Cell, New Delhi. The appellant has been in judicial custody/police custody since 04.02.2009 i.e., for a period of more than 12=-years as of date.
2. By way of the present appeal filed under section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 ("N.I.A. Act") the appellant impugns order dated 20.03.2021 made by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi ("ASJ") rejecting his bail application in the above ref
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
