Back
ANU MALHOTRA
Morchana Oriental Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
ORDER
Crl.M.A. No.20970/2021
1. Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.
Crl.M.C. No. 3538/2021 and Crl.M.A. No.20969/2021
2. The petitioner vide the present petition assails the impugned order dated 21.12.2021 of the Court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-03, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in CR No. 360/2021.
3. Vide the said order, notice of the revision petition was directed to be issued to the respondent thereto i.e., the present petitioner, on taking of steps within 7 days for 24.1.2022 with it having been directed that the impugned order was stayed till the next date of hearing. The proceedings dated 21.12.2021 before the learned Additional Sessions Judge-03, New Delhi are to the effect:
"21.12.2021
Fresh revision petition received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered.
Present: Sh. Gaurav Arora and Ms. Yogayta, Ld. Counsels for the revisionist.
Heard.
Notice of the revision petition be issued to the respondent on filing of PF/RC for 24.01.2022.
Steps be taken within seven days.
Impugned order is stayed till the next date of hearing.
At request a copy of this order be given dasti.
A copy of this order be sent to Ld. Trial Court. TCR be summoned two days pr
The main legal point established is the importance of providing reasoned orders in the decision-making process, as it facilitates the consideration of the application of mind at the time of passing a....
The complainant's right to seek further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, should not be misused by filing repeated applications without fresh material, and t....
It is the duty of a Judge to sustain the judicial balance and not to think of an order which can cause trauma to the process of adjudication
while exercising the powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and/or under Article 226 of the Constitution of India referred to hereinabove, the High Court has to give brief reasons why such an interim order....
The order passed on application filed under Section 91 of Cr.P.C. was interlocutory in nature. The accused persons had not been summoned to appear before the Court concerned. The investigation in the....
Point of law: Inherent power of a High Court – Rejection of quash petition - complaint clearly makes out commission of cognizable offences both under the PC Act as well as IPC, it is impermissible to....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
