SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 2077

MUKTA GUPTA
Chidi Berr Nwayoga @ James – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Anuj Kapoor, Advocate, for the Appellant.
Amit Gupta, APP, for the State with ASI Om Prakash, PS Narcotics Cell, Crime Branch.

JUDGMENT

1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 10th August 2017 whereby the appellant was convicted for offences punishable under Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act and the order on sentence dated 23rd August, 2017 whereby he was directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1 lakh, in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months for offence punishable under Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for 1 month under Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, the appellant prefers the present appeal. Along with the appellant, one Abdul Khaliq was also tried, however, he was convicted only for offence punishable under Section 14 of the Foreigners Act and acquitted for offence punishable under Sections 21(c) read with 29 of the NDPS Act.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that on the same evidence, the co-accused of the appellant namely Abdul Khaliq who was charged for offences punishable under Section 21(c) read with 29 of the NDPS Act has been acquitted with the specific finding that since no recovery was made from him, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top