Raj Kumar Hingorani vs Shilpi Srivastav Hingorani

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Del) 645

MINI PUSHKARNA
Raj Kumar Hingorani – Appellant
Versus
Shilpi Srivastav Hingorani – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Addtya Kapoor with Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Advocates, Mr. Vineet Jhanji with Mr. Imran Moulaey, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

Mini Pushkarna, J.

CM APPL. 20839/2023 (Application under Section 151 CPC seeking exemption from filing certified copies/true typed/legible copies of the orders, documents, notices, applications etc)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CM (M) 671/2023 & CM APPL. 20838/2023 (Application under Section 151 CPC seeking Ad-interim exparte stay on the HMA No. 171/2018 titled “Shilpi Srivastav v. Raj Kumar Hingorani” pending before the Ld. Judge, Family Courts, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi during the pendency of the captioned petition)

3. The present is a petition challenging the order dated 23.01.2023 passed by the learned Judge, Family Courts, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in HMA No. 171/2018, by which the opportunity of the petitioner-husband to lead evidence has been closed.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner husband submits that the petitioner is ready to settle the matter and that one opportunity may be granted in that regard.

5. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-wife submits that the matter has already been heard finally by the learned Family Court on 20.04.2023 and the matter has been re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document