IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Mini Pushkarna, J.
Pushplata Sharma - Petitioner
Versus
Estate Officer Public Works Department - Respondent
CM(M) 672 of 2023
Decided On : 26-04-2023
Exemption - Additional Documents - Writ Petition for Setting Aside Eviction Order and Restoration of Possession
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to set aside an eviction order and restore possession of the premises during the pendency of an appeal. The petitioner had earlier been granted stay by the court, but the appeal was dismissed in default due to medical reasons, and the restoration application was pending for a long time. The petitioner was evicted from the premises and sought restoration of possession due to health reasons and inability to find suitable accommodation.
Finding of the Court:
The court granted the petitioner liberty to approach the District Court for interim directions and expedited consideration of the restoration application by the District Judge. The court declined to grant any immediate relief to the petitioner.
Issues: The issues involved the dismissal of the appeal in default, delay in the restoration application, and the eviction order during the pendency of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for expeditious consideration of the restoration application and directed the District Judge to deal with it promptly. The court also considered the petitioner's health reasons and inability to find suitable accommodation but declined to grant immediate relief.
Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with the grant of liberty to the petitioner to approach the District Court and directions to the District Judge to expedite consideration of the restoration application.
JUDGMENT :
Mini Pushkarna, J.
CM APPL. 20933/2023
1. The present is an application seeking exemption from filing certified copy, dim, hand written, illegible copies of certain orders.
2. Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.
3. Application stands disposed of accordingly.
CM APPL. 20934/2023
4. The present is an application seeking permission to file additional documents viz. medical documents, photographs and e-mails.
5. The said documents have already been filed along with the petition, the same are taken on record.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the application is disposed of.
CM(M) 672/2023 and CM APPL. 20935/2023
7. The present writ petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner with prayer for setting aside the order dated 05.04.2023 passed by the Estate Officer and order dated 10.04.2023 passed by the learned District Judge (Headquarter) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. There is a further prayer for restoration of the possession of the premises to the petitioner during the pendency of the appeal before the learned District Judge (Headquarter) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
8. It is submitted that the present petition has been filed impugning the Eviction Order dated 05.04.2023 passed by the Estate Officer, PWD and Order dated 10.04.2023 passed by the learned District Judge (Headquarter) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. It is submitted that the eviction order has been issued during the pendency of the application of the petitioner for restoration of the appeal.
9. It is submitted that the petitioner herein was earlier granted stay by this Court in CM (M) No. 310/2022 by order dated 27.04.2022, till the disposal of stay application in PPA No. 02/2021, pending before the learned District Judge (Headquarter), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. It is submitted that stay application was allowed by the learned District Judge (Headquarter) on 06.05.2022 and thus, the stay in favour of the petitioner continued.
10. It is submitted that the appeal being PPA No. 02/2021 titled as Pushplata Sharma v. The Estate Officer, PWD was pending before the Ld. District Judge (Headquarter), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi and the same was listed for final arguments on 20.10.2022. It is submitted that due to medical reason, the petitioner could not come to the Court on that date. Similarly, the counsel for the petitioner was also unable to appear before the learned District Judge on the said date. Thus, the appeal i.e. PPA No. 02/2021 was dismissed in default on the said date i.e. 20.10.2022.
11. It is submitted that immediately an application for the restoration was filed on behalf of the petitioner herein. However, the said restoration application is pending before the Court of learned District Judge (Headquarter), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi for long.
12. Attention of this Court has been drawn to Annexure P-3, which is the application for restoration filed on behalf of the petitioner on 27.10.2022. It is the contention on behalf of the petitioner that the appeal of the petitioner was dismissed in default on 20.10.2022 and the application for restoration was filed immediately on 27.10.2022. It is further submitted that despite filing of the application for restoration on 27.10.2022, the said application has been pending for the last six months and till date, reply on behalf of the respondent has not been filed. It is further submitted that during the pendency of the application for restoration of the appeal, an eviction order dated 05.04.2023 was passed by the learned Estate Officer, PWD for vacation of the public premises i.e. Quarter No. 1987, Type II, Sindora Khurd, Delhi.
13. None appears for the respondent, despite advance service to the respondent on their official e-mail address.
14. It is not disputed that pursuant to the eviction order dated 05.04.2023, the petitioner has already been evicted on 12.04.2023.
15. The petitioner seeks restoration of the possession of the public premises on the ground that due to Covid - 19 and age related health factors, she could not find an
A stay of a judgment may be deemed unnecessary if the respondent formally undertakes that parallel administrative recovery or eviction proceedings will be conducted independently and without being in....
The court reaffirmed the necessity of handling related applications together to ensure judicial efficiency, highlighting that monetary claim stays and possession restoration must not be dismissed as ....
The appellate court correctly dismissed the stay application, affirming the need for the defendant to argue the appeal on merits without unnecessary delays.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.