JUDGMENT :

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.

The present Appeal has been filed by the Appellant inter-alia challenging the order dated 22.03.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in Cont. Cas(C) 908/2021 and Cont. Cas(C) 400/2021 [hereinafter referred as “the Impugned Order”].

2. Cont. Cas(C) 908/2021 was filed by the Appellant alleging that the Respondent No. 1 had taken the minor child on 28.03.2021 into a Covid containment zone, thereby subjecting the child to the risk of Covid-19 while, Cas(C) 400/2021 was filed by Respondent No. 1 alleging violation of visitation rights by the Appellant.

3. By the Impugned Order, the learned Single Judge had granted visitation to the Respondent No. 1 on the 1st and 3rd Saturday of every month from 10 AM to 6 PM on each visit, continuing the already existing orders for visitation passed inter-alia by the Family Courts at Saket Courts, New Delhi in the Guardianship Petition G.P. No. 48 of 2012. It is against alleged violations made to these visitations rights that the Appellant approached this Court by way of challenge in Cont. Cas(C) 908/2021.

4. Pursuant to our interactions in Chamber with the parties and the minor child and after reviewing the contents of