SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 2147

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, J.
Colvyn James Harris – Appellant
Versus
Flexing it Services Private Limited and Another - Respondents.
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 119 of 2023
Decided on : 18-04-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Tishampati Sen, Ms. Riddhi Sanchet, Mr. Anurag Anand, Ms. Tasmiya Teleha, Advs.
Mr. Nakul Dewan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Esenese Obhan, Mr. Ashimam Obhan, Ms. Ayesha Ghuthakurtha, Ms. Tansi Fatedar, Mr. Seerat Bhutan, Advs.

The importance of full and correct disclosure when seeking discretionary relief, and the need for clean hands in approaching the court.

Headnote:

Arbitration - Debenture Subscription Agreement - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 9

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner invested in the respondent company and sought conversion of Compulsorily Convertible Debentures (CCDs) into equity shares. The respondent delayed the conversion and offered a lower shareholding percentage to the petitioner.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner concealed vital correspondences and failed to disclose the negotiation on the conversion terms, leading to a dismissal of the petition. The court emphasized the need for clean hands and full disclosure when seeking discretionary relief.

Issues: Concealment of correspondences, entitlement to shareholding percentage, delay in conversion, and irreparable harm.

Ratio Decidendi: The petitioner's concealment of correspondences and failure to show irreparable harm led to the dismissal of the petition. The court emphasized the importance of full and correct disclosure when seeking discretionary relief.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, with the petitioner advised to seek remedy before the Arbitral Tribunal. The court requested the nominated arbitrators to expedite the constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal.

JUDGMENT :

Navin Chawla, J.

I.A.7211/2023 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 119/2023

2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) praying for the following reliefs:

“a. Direct the Respondents to maintain status quo with respect to the shares, shareholding, other securities, as well as its assets and properties during the pendency of arbitration proceedings between the parties;

b. Direct the Respondents to maintain status quo on the conversion of the CCDs of the Petitioners as well as other CCD holders;

c. Direct the Respondents to provide the financial reports, term sheet of the international investor, details of other CCD holders, notes of meetings with other CCD investors and other relevant information as being sought by the Petitioner.”

3. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner had invested 50,000 USD in the respondent no. 1 company pursuant to the Debenture Subscription Agreement dated 16.07.2015 executed between the parties. Clause 6.1 of the said Agreement provided for automatic conversion of the Compulsorily Convertible Debenture (CCDs), and reads as under:

“6.1 Automatic Conversion.

Each Investor CCD shall stand mandatorily converted into fully paid-up Equity Shares on the occurrence of the earlier of:

(i) Upon the occurrence of the Qualified Financing (defined hereinafter); or

(ii) At the expiry of 1.5 (One and a half) years from the date of issuance of the Investor CCD, in the manner set forth below whichever is earlier.”

4. Clause 6.2.1 to 6.2.4 of the Agreement provided for the conversion rate in an eventuality where prior to the expiry of one and a half years from the closing date, the respondent no. 1 consummates the financing and issues equity or quasi-equity securities to a third party. Clause 6.2.5 is the default clause in case the respondent no. 1 is not able to obtain the qualified financing. Clause 6.2 reads as under:

“6.2 Conversion Rate

6.2.1 In the event the Company consummates, prior to the expiry of 1.5 (One and a half) years from the Closing Date, a financing pursuant to which it issues equity or quasi-equity securities to a third party (“Qualified Financing Securities”) amounting to a minimum of USD 1,000,000/- (United States Dollars One Million only) with the principal purpose of raising capital (a “Qualified Financing”), then the Investor CCDs will convert in accordance with Sections 6.2.2, 6.2.3, 6.2.4 and 6.2.5.

6.2.2 If the pre-money valuation in the Qualified Financing is les; than or equal to USO 15,000,000 (US Dollar Fifteen Million only), the Investor CCDs shall automatically convert into a number of Equity Shares determined by dividing the total principal outstanding under the Investor CCDs by the conversion price equal to the Applicable Discount (defined hereinafter) applied to the lowest per Equity Share purchase price paid for the Securities issued in the Qualified Financing, with such quotient rounded off to the nearest whole number.

6.2.3 If the pre-money valuation in the Qualified Financing is more than USD 15,000,000 (US Dollar Fifteen Million only) the Investor CCDs shall automatically convert at a conversion price determined as if the pre-money valuation in such Qualified Financing is USD 15,000,000 (US Dollar Fifteen Million only).

6.2.4 For the purpose of this Section, Applicable Discount shall be determined with reference to the Investment Subscription Amount, in accordance with the table below:

Investment (USD)

Applicable Discount

Equal to or greater than $50,000

25%

From $20,000 to $49,999

20%

Equal to or Less than $19,999

15%

6.2.5 In the event of non-occurrence of a Qualified Financing (amounting to a minimum of USD Million) within a period of 1.5 (one and a half) years from the date of issuance of the Inve

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top