IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.
Taslim - Petitioner
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) - Respondent
Bail Appln. No.548 Of 2023
Decided On : 17-04-2023
NDPS Act - Bail Application - Section 21, 25, 29 - Section 37 - Summary of the acts and sections referenced and discussed by the court: The court discussed the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which imposes limitations on granting bail to a person accused of an offence under the Act. The court highlighted the conditions that must be satisfied for granting bail and emphasized the requirement of reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence. The court also referred to relevant case laws to support its decision.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr. P.C. in a case related to the recovery of 1 kg of Heroin from the co-accused with whom the petitioner was traveling in a car. The petitioner claimed to be falsely implicated and argued that he was only a companion in the vehicle with no recovery from him.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the recovery of commercial quantity of Heroin from the co-accused with whom the petitioner was traveling, along with the serious allegations against the petitioner, did not provide reasonable grounds for believing that the petitioner was not guilty of the offence. The court dismissed the bail application based on the limitations prescribed under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
Issues: The issues involved the petitioner's alleged false implication, the recovery of Heroin from the co-accused with whom the petitioner was traveling, and the application of Section 37 of the NDPS Act in the bail application.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the absence of possession of the contraband on the person of the accused-petitioner did not absolve him of the level of scrutiny required under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act. The court emphasized the requirement of reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence.
Final Decision: The bail application was dismissed, and the court clarified that the decision did not express any opinion on the merits of the case.
JUDGMENT :
(Rajnish Bhatnagar, J.) :—
1. This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr. P.C. seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 781/2021 under Sections 21, 25 and 29 NDPS Act registered at Police Station Bhalswa Dairy, Delhi.
2. In brief the facts of the case are that on 08.11.2021 at about 5:00 pm, a secret information was received by SI Dilbag about a person, namely, Arshad Ali who in association with Asif Kasai and Bhure r/o Fateh ganj Bareilly, UP was indulging in sale and supply of Heroin in Delhi and UP and they were coming to deliver a consignment of Heroin near Bhalswa Lake, Delhi in Taxi No. UP-25-DT-5525 between 9:00 pm to 11:00 pm. The raiding party left for the spot vide DD No. 6 at 7:30 pm along with informer in a private vehicle No. DL-8C-AZ-7412 driven by Ct. Arun. At about 10:10 pm, a white colored taxi car No. UP-25DT-5525 was intercepted. The persons sitting in the car were identified as Arshad Ali, Taslim (petitioner herein) and Arshad Khan/driver. During cursory search of Arshad Ali, a black colored raxin bag was recovered and the said bag was found containing a black colored polythene packet. The black colored polythene packet further contained a transparent polythene packet duly tied with rubber band and on opening the transparent packet, it was found containing light brown colored powdery substance. On checking and weighing, the transparent polythene packet was found containing 1 kg of HEROIN. Samples were drawn from the seized contraband and all the mandatory provisions of NDPS Act were duly complied with. After following due procedure, the case vide FIR No. 781/2021 under Sections 21, 25 and 29 NDPS Act was got registered at Police Station Bhalswa Dairy, Delhi.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and perused the status report filed by the state.
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and is in judicial custody since 09.11.2021. It is further submitted that the petitioner is a barber by profession, and he was being taken by the co-accused Arshad Ali for hair cutting to some marriage ceremony when he got caught along with the co-accused. He submitted that he was only a companion in the vehicle which was driven by co-accused Arshad Khan and no recovery has been effected from the petitioner and the chargesheet has already been filed, therefore, no purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in judicial custody.
5. On the other hand, learned APP vehemently opposed the bail application and has argued on the lines of the status report. It is submitted by the Ld. APP that the petitioner was sitting in the car when the recovered contraband i.e., 1 kg heroin which is commercial quantity was recovered from the co-accused. He further submitted that even the CDR shows that co-accused from whom the recovery has been effected was present along with the petitioner at the same location. He further submitted that all the three accused persons including the petitioner herein were apprehended from the same spot while carrying the recovered contraband and petitioner was sitting on rear seat of the car. It is contended by the Ld. APP that the petitioner and co-accused Arshad Ali are residents of the same locality of Bareilly, UP and were in connivance with each other in commission of the offence and the petitioner was being paid by the co-accused Arshad Ali for accompanying him for the delivery of the said contraband. Lastly, it is submitted by the Ld. APP that keeping in view the recovery of commercial quantity and the serious allegations against the petitioner, there is strong likelihood of him absconding if released on bail.
6. In the present case, a black colored raxin bag was recovered from co-accused Arshad Ali and inside the bag was another black colored polythene packet in which a transparent polythene packet duly tied with rubber band was found containing 1 kg of Heroi
The court held that the substantial quantity of drugs recovered invoked the strict provisions of the NDPS Act, justifying the denial of bail.
The court emphasized that the reasonable belief required for bail under Section 37 NDPS Act necessitates substantially probable causes for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offe....
The limitations prescribed for the grant of bail under Section 37 NDPS Act require substantially probable causes for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence.
The recovery of an intermediate quantity of contraband, completion of investigation, and lack of evidence regarding the petitioner's bad antecedents were key factors in granting bail.
The court established that the recovery of an intermediate quantity of narcotics does not invoke the restrictions under Section 37 NDPS Act, allowing bail when the accused poses no flight risk and th....
The recovery of intermediate quantity, completion of investigation, and filing of chargesheet are crucial factors in considering bail applications under the NDPS Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.