SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 2163

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, JJ.
St. Stephen's Hospital College Of Nursing - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. – Respondents
LPA 393 of 2022, CM APPL Nos. 28243 of 2022, 28244 of 2022 & 28245 of 2022
Decided on : 03-06-2022

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shruti Sharma and Mr. Saket Chandra, Advocates
For the Respondents: Mr. T.P. Singh
For the Indian Nursing Council :Mr. Alok Jain, Advocate
For the GGSIPU :Ms. Ekta Sikri, Advocate

The potential impact of extending the cut-off date on the academic session and the students' education was a key consideration in the court's decision.

Headnote:

Discrimination - Admission Process for B.Sc Nursing Course - Indian Nursing Council, NEET Examination - 21.03.2022, 31.03.2022, 07.04.2022, 15.05.2022 - The court discussed the standards of Nursing laid down by the Indian Nursing Council, the mode and manner for filling up seats in Nursing Colleges, and the admission process for Central Government colleges. The court highlighted the time period prescribed for the admission process and the potential impact of extending the cut-off date on the academic session.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, a college affiliated to GGSIPU, challenged the extension of the last date of admission to B.Sc Nursing Course for the Academic Session 2021-2022. The appellant alleged discrimination as the admission process for non-Central Government Colleges was closed earlier than for Central Government colleges.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that extending the cut-off date would disrupt the academic session and result in a zero year for the students, which would not be beneficial. The court also noted that the admission process for the next academic session was already underway.

Issues: Discrimination in the admission process, potential disruption of the academic session, and the impact of extending the cut-off date.

Ratio Decidendi: The court decided that any extension of the date would disrupt the academic session and result in a zero year for the students, which is not beneficial. The court also considered the ongoing admission process for the next academic session.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the court found no reason to interfere with the impugned order.

JUDGMENT :

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. Appellant impugns judgment dated 27.05.2022 whereby the petition filed by the Petitioner, seeking quashing of Notification dated 23.12.2021 extending the last date of completing admission to B.Sc (Hons) Nursing Course for the Academic Session 2021-2022 upto 15.06.2022, has been dismissed.

2. Appellant is a college affiliated to Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (“GGSIPU”) and inter alia, conducts the course of B.Sc Nursing. The National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (“NEET”) for the said course was conducted in September, 2021 and result declared in December, 2021.

3. Indian Nursing Council, which is the parent Body, fixed the last date of admission as 21.03.2022. The date was thereafter extended to 31.03.2022.

4. A writ petition was filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) by one of the colleges, though not part of the concerned University. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) by its judgment dated 31.03.2022 extended the last date of admission to 07.04.2022 for the Nursing Course.

5. The grievance of the Appellant is that for the colleges affiliated with the University but run by the Central Government, the admission process continued upto 15.05.2022, whereas the admission process for the Appellant and other non Central Government Colleges, was closed on 07.04.2022.

6. It is contended by learned Senior Counsel for the Appellant that the appellant has been discriminated and it is prayed that the admission process be permitted to be continued for another period of atleast a week to enable filling up of the unfilled seats in the appellant- College. Learned Senior Counsel for the appellant submits that the academic session commenced only on 23.05.2022.

7. By the impugned judgment, learned Single Judge has held that Indian Nursing Council is a Statutory Autonomous Body operating under the aegis of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, which lays down the standards of Nursing and also lays down the mode and manner for filling up the seats in Nursing Colleges. Medical Counselling Committee is responsible for conducting counselling for 15% of All India Quota Seats for undergraduate Courses – which comprises of seats in Central Government Hospitals and Colleges. It is an admitted position that the seats in the appellant-College would also be filled up on All India basis.

8. Learned Single Judge has noticed that the time period prescribed for carrying out the admission process for the appellant as well as non-governmental colleges was restricted by Indian Medical Council upto 31.03.2022, which was later extended upto 07.04.2022.

9. Learned Senior Counsel for the appellant contends that the cutoff date was fixed for all colleges irrespective of whether they were Central Government colleges or non-Central Governmental Colleges. However, the admission process for Central Government Colleges affiliated to GGSIP University was permitted to continue upto 15.05.2022. He submits that in view of the discrimination against the appellant, appellant should also be permitted to continue with the admission process for at least a week.

10. Learned counsel appearing for Indian Nursing Council submits that cut-off date was 31.03.2022, which was extended by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) to 07.04.2022 and for all colleges across the country the said cut-off date was followed and no admission was permitted in non-Central Government Colleges after 07.04.2022.

11. Learned Counsel submits that in case the extension was granted, it would have an percolating effect on all colleges across the country, which are nearly two thousand in number. He further submits that academic session is likely to be affected for the reason that if the date is extended, the academic session which has commenced in several colleges would be adversely affected. He further submits that NEET Examination for the next year i.e. Academic Session 2022-23 is already under p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top