SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 2456

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
D.N. PATEL, JYOTI SINGH, JJ.
Karan Chaudhry – Appellant
Versus
Indira Gandhi National Open University And Ors - Respondents
LPA 222 of 2021 & CM APPL. 24182 of 2021 (Interim directions)
Decided on : 06-08-2021

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Kuber Boddh, Mr. V.S. Dubey & Ms. Kalyani Lal Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate

Eligibility for examination is contingent upon completion of the minimum time period i.e. a full academic year as per the University's Ordinance.

Headnote:

Re-registration - Eligibility for Examination - Ordinance - Clause 9(1), Clause 5(e)(v) - The court held that in order to be eligible to appear in the Term-End Examinations, a student must have completed the minimum time period i.e. a full academic year. The Appellant's non-registration for the third year examination was on account of his own lapse and not due to any technical defect in the University's online portal. The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decision of the learned Single Judge.

Fact of the Case:

The Appellant sought to appear in the third-year examination scheduled to be held in August, 2021, but was deemed ineligible due to belated registration for the third year. The Appellant argued that the non-registration was due to a technical lapse of the University's portal.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Appellant's non-registration for the third year examination was on account of his own lapse and not due to any technical defect in the University's online portal. The court upheld the decision of the learned Single Judge and dismissed the appeal.

Issues: The main issue was whether the Appellant was eligible to appear in the third-year examination scheduled in August, 2021, despite belated registration for the third year.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that in order to be eligible to appear in the Term-End Examinations, a student must have completed the minimum time period i.e. a full academic year. The Appellant's non-registration for the third year examination was on account of his own lapse and not due to any technical defect in the University's online portal.

Final Decision: The Appeal along with the pending application was dismissed by the court.

JUDGMENT :

D.N. PATEL, J.

Proceedings have been conducted through video conferencing.

1. The Appellant herein assails the judgment dated 28.07.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. (C) No. 7150/2021, whereby the writ petition was dismissed on the ground that the Appellant is not eligible to appear in the third-year examination scheduled to be held in August, 2020 on account of his belated registration for the third year in January, 2021.

2. The Appellant was enrolled as a student in the B.A. Programme in Indira Gandhi National Open University/Respondents in 2018. As per the case set out by the Appellant, in June, 2019, the Appellant filled the examination form for the first year but could not appear in the written examination scheduled in June, 2019, on account of some personal difficulty. Between March to July, 2019, Respondents informed the students for Re-registration process for the second year and accordingly, the Appellant deposited the Re-registration fee and the registration started for the second year. In March, 2020, Appellant filled the examination form on due dates for both the first and the second year, to be held in June, 2020 and also submitted all the assignments.

3. On 11.03.2020, Covid-19 was declared as a Pandemic and on 24.03.2020, a nationwide lockdown was declared, which continued till 31.05.2020. Ultimately, the Appellant took the first-year examination only in February-March, 2021 on account of the postponement of the exams due to Covid-19 Pandemic. As far as the second-year examinations are concerned, they were not held in June, 2020 and the students were promoted to the third year pursuant to a Notification of the University dated 10.12.2020.

4. The Appellant registered for third year course in January, 2021. The Respondents issued a Notification dated 09.07.2021, scheduling the examination for the final/end-semester, students in August, 2021 and the students were required to register for the same between 17.05.2021 and 12.07.2021. Appellant was informed on 14.07.2021 that registration for the final year examination to be held in August, 2021 was closed and that he would be eligible to appear only in December, 2021. Feeling aggrieved, the Appellant filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Respondents to accept the Appellant’s third year Re-registration from July, 2020 instead from January, 2020 and allow him to fill the examination form for the examination scheduled in August, 2021.

5. The learned Single Judge, vide the impugned judgment, dismissed the writ petition primarily on the ground that the period of enrolment in each year of the B.A. Programme is one year, which the Appellant had not completed till August, 2021 and none of the stipulations in the Ordinance to that effect had been challenged. Learned Single Judge did not find force in the reasons put forth by the Appellant for failure to re-register i.e. the Appellant tried several times to fill the online examination form, but his third year courses were not shown on the online portal and he was, thus, unable to register.

6. Learned counsel for the Appellant impugns the judgment of the learned Single Judge and contends that the learned Single Judge failed to take into consideration that the Appellant had tried his best to access the online portal for admission to final year (June-TEE) Exam, 2021, but was unable to register as the choice of his subjects for the B.A. Programme was not displayed on the selection option on the portal. Thus, the non-registration was on account of a technical lapse of the University’s portal.

7. It is further contended that the admission to the B.A. Programme for three years had been taken by the Appellant in the year 2018 and the Re-registration procedure was a mere formality for depositing fee. It is also submitted that the admission and subsequent Re-registration of the Appellant is governed by the Prospectus issued by Respondent No. 1 in the year 2018 and not the one issued in 2021, upon which the lear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top