AMIT BANSAL
NAS – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Guest House Services Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
AMIT BANSAL, J.
I.A. 3797/2020(u/O-XXXIX R-1 & 2 of CPC), I.A. 3804/2020 (u/OXXXIX R-1 & 2 of CPC) and I.A. 4683/2021(O-XXXIX R-4 of CPC)
1. By way of the present judgment, I shall decide the applications filed on behalf of the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking interim injunction against the defendants and the application filed on behalf of the defendant no.1 under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC.
2. The present suit has been filed seeking relief of perpetual/permanent injunction restraining the defendants from dispossessing the plaintiff and interfering with the peaceful and continuous enjoyment and possession of the plaintiff in respect of the property situated at 15, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Road, New Delhi–110011 and other ancillary reliefs.
3. Vide order dated 4th May, 2020, while issuing summons in the suit, the defendants were directed to maintain status quo with respect to possession and ownership of the properties bearing no. 15, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Road and 2 Rajesh Pilot Lane as well as with respect to all services and facilities being presently provided to the plaintiff in and in relation to the plaintiff’s
Bacha F. Guzdar v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Ebrahimi v. Westbourne Galleries Ltd. [(1972) 2 All ER 492 : 1973 AC 360 : (1972) 2 WLR 1289 (HL)]
Kilpest (P) Ltd. v. Shekhar Mehra [(1996) 10 SCC 696]
Kapila Hingorani v. State of Bihar [(2003) 6 SCC 1 : 2004 SCC (L&S) 586
Sangramsinh P. Gaekwad v. Shantadevi P. Gaekwad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.