Rain Cii Carbon (VIZAG) Ltd. vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Del) 2243

SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Rain Cii Carbon (VIZAG) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
P. Chidambaram, Senior Advocate & Rajashekhar Rao, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shivani Khandekar, Gokul Holani, Ms. Yamini Mukherji, Advocates, for the Petitioners in LPA 25/2021 & CM APPLS. 2070/2021, 13380/2021 & 44359/2022 & W.P.(C) 5749/2021 & CM APPLs. 18030/2021, 6228/2022, 12851/2022 & 44360/2022.
Chetan Sharma, ASG with Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Kushagra Kumar, Ms. Aakriti Roy, Vineet Malhotra, Vishal Gohri & Ms. Kirti Sarin, Advocates, for the UOI in LPA 25/2021 & CM APPLS. 2070/2021, 13380/2021 & 44359/2022 & LPA 70/2021 & CM APPL. 6050/2021 & LPA 71/2021 & CM APPL. 6056/2021 & W.P.(C) 5749/2021 & CM APPLs. 18030/2021, 6228/2022, 12851/2022 & 44360/2022
Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Ashish Prasad, Ms. Mukta Dutta, Abhishek Shivpuri, Vinay Tripahi & Vinemra Kopariha, Advocates, for the Sanvira in LPA 25/2021 & CM APPLS. 2070/2021, 13380/2021 & 44359/2022 & LPA 70/2021 & CM APPL. 6050/2021 & LPA 71/2021 & CM APPL. 6056/2021 & W.P.(C) 5749/2021 & CM APPLs. 18030/2021, 6228/2022, 12851/2022 & 44360/2022 & W.P.(C) 6258/2022 & CM APPL. 18850/2022.
Gaurav Kejriwal, Advocate, for the Petitioner in LPA 70/2021 & CM APPL. 6050/2021.
Dhananjaya Mishra, Arnav Dash, Navneet Dogra, Ayan Rai, Advocates, for the Petitioner in LPA 71/2021 & CM APPL. 6056/2021.
T.V.S. Raghavendra Sreyas, Ms. Gayatri Gulati, Siddharth Vasudev, Advocates, for the Resoibdent-4.
Shubhranshu Padhi, Vishal Bansal, Advocates, for the Respondent-5.

Table of Content
1. description of case matters. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. court's consideration of evidence and orders. (Para 8 , 10 , 33 , 36)
3. arguments regarding production capacity and allocation. (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. ratio of decision based on established capacities. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 24)
5. final conclusion on allocation and directives. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)

JUDGMENT

1. At the outset, it is imperative to set out the description of each of these matters. LPA Nos. 25/2021, 70/2021 and 71/2021 have been filed by the Appellants challenging the common Judgment dated 15.01.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge, disposing W.P.(C) Nos. 3709/2020, 3773/2020 and 3773/2020, respectively.

2. W.P.(C) 5749/2021 has been filed by the Petitioners challenging the Minutes of Meeting dated 10.05.2021, Public Notices dated 31.03.2021 and 17.04.2020 issued by the DGFT as well as Letter dated 04.05.2020 issued by Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board (hereafter, "APPCB").

3. W.P.(C) 6258/2022 has been filed by the Petitioners challenging the Minutes of Meeting dated 09.03.2022, Public Notice dated 10.02.2022 issued by the DGFT as wel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Del) 2243

SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASADRain Cii Carbon (VIZAG) Ltd. – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Rain Cii Carbon (VIZAG) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent