IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, Vikas Mahajan, JJ.
Harkesh Kumar Dang – Appellant
Versus
Tamanna Dang – Respondent
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 200 of 2022 & CM Appls. 54168-54171 of 2022
Decided On : 12-01-2023
Guardianship - Territorial Jurisdiction - Guardian & Wards Act, 1890, Section 7, 8, 12, 25
Fact of the Case:
The appellant challenges the Family Court's decision on territorial jurisdiction regarding the guardianship petition for the child. The parties have reached a settlement on custody, visitation rights, and financial support.
Finding of the Court:
The settlement terms are found to be lawful and are accepted by the court. The court declares the respondent-mother as the legal guardian of the child and requests all competent authorities to recognize her as such. The appeal is disposed of based on the settlement terms.
Issues: Territorial jurisdiction, guardianship, custody, visitation rights, financial support, divorce by mutual consent, waiver of statutory period, settlement terms enforcement.
Ratio Decidendi: The court acknowledges the settlement reached by the parties and accepts their undertakings. It also emphasizes the best interest of the child and encourages an amicable resolution of disputes.
Final Decision: The court accepts the settlement terms, declares the respondent-mother as the legal guardian of the child, and disposes of the appeal based on the settlement. The parties are expected to abide by the terms and conditions of the settlement and show compassion in resolving any future issues.
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)
1. Appellant/father (Harkesh Kumar Dang) impugns order dated 12.12.2022 of the Family Court whereby the Family Court has held that the ordinary place of residence of the child 'Vivaan Dang' being Munich, Germany, the Courts at Delhi would have no territorial jurisdiction and accordingly dismissed the Guardianship Petition filed by the Appellant/Petitioner (father of the child), under section 7 read with sections 8, 12 and 25 of the Guardian & Wards Act, 1890, on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction. The passport of the child was directed to be released to the Respondent/mother (Tamanna Dang), which has already been released to her.
2. After some discussions, parties, who are also present in court in person, have agreed to end all their disputes, vis-a-vis, their inter-se marital relationship; custody of the child; visitation rights of the appellant vis-'-vis, the child and the financial support for upbringing of the child to be provided by the appellant to the respondent.
3. The settlement terms duly signed by the parties as well as their counsels have been handed over in Court. The same are taken on record.
4. The settlement terms agreed to between the parties are extracted herein for the purposes of completion and are as under:
1. It is agreed between Harkesh Kumar Dang and Tamanna Dang that Tamanna Dang being the mother of Vivaan Dang will be lawful guardian of Vivaan Dang.
The child VIVAAN will return to Munich, Germany with the mother, namely, Tamanna. Tamanna will have sole custody rights of the minor child and Harkesh will have only visitation rights. Moreover, the Tamanna will shall be at [sic] exclusive rights to decide all the major decisions in respect to Vivaan's upbringing.
i) During 06 weeks of vacations in August to September of each year; Harkesh and Tamanna will share the vacations on 50:50 basis and the child Vivaan will spend 03 weeks with the father in Delhi, NCR.
ii) During 02 weeks of vacations in December- January of each year, the child will spend 01 week with the father in Delhi, NCR (India).
iii) Harkesh will not remove the child out of Delhi, NCR (India) without the written consent of the mother/Tamanna. For facilitating visitation, as agreed in Clause (i) and (ii), Tamanna and the child will travel to Delhi (India) and Harkesh will provide To-Fro air tickets for both. Harkesh is [sic] liberty to avail visitation rights {as agreed in Clause (i) and (ii)} by coming to Munich, Germany. Tamanna shall always retain the passport of the child with her. Tamanna can speak with the child once every day through Video-Audio call; Tamanna will meet the child twice a week for about 02 hours each time. During the time the child spends with the father/Harkesh, the father will ensure that the location of the child's mobile phone is 'On'.
iv) Harkesh will have access to the child through audio-video call during the period the child is with Tamanna in Germany, at-least 05 times a week varying 10-15 minutes and the child will be provided with the mobile phone.
v) Harkesh shall pay to Tamanna for up-bringing of Vivaan 1000 Euros every month during the first year from the date of signing of this settlement agreement, after one year from the date of signing of this settlement agreement, it shall become 1,500 euros every month and after two years from the date of signing of this settlement agreement, it shall be 2,000 euros every month by way of bank transfer in below German Account of Tamanna Dang. BANK NAME: DEUTSCHE BANK Munich, Germany Beneficiary Name: Tamanna Dang IBAN: DE57 7007 0024 0708 5152 00 BIC:DEUTDEDBMUC The remittance shall be made not later 7th day of each English Calendar month.
vi) Should Harkesh decide to re-locate himself back to Munich, Germany. The Visitation rights for Harkesh shall be every alternate week from Thursday to Monday Morning in addition to that fixed in Para 1 of clauses (i) and (ii). Tamanna shall always retain the passport of the child with he
The court emphasizes the best interest of the child and encourages amicable resolution of disputes, accepting the settlement reached by the parties.
The welfare of the child is of paramount importance in determining custody. The court must consider all the attending circumstances and the totality of the situation on a case-by-case basis. Ex-parte....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of territorial jurisdiction under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, and the consideration of the best interest of the child in the....
Custody of child – Grant of custodial visitation right to father- Mother of child (custodial parent) shall not conceal the whereabouts of the child from father.
The paramount consideration in custody disputes is the welfare of the child, over parental rights or allegations against a parent.
The child's citizenship and residence, along with the jurisdiction of the court where the child ordinarily resides, determine custody rights in international custody disputes.
Maintenance case - Visiting right - Terms and conditions to exercise visitation rights contained in clause 9 can be varied, altered and modified, but frequency of visitation cannot be less than four ....
The Family Court's discretion to allow legal representation is conditional upon compliance with prior court orders regarding child custody.
Legal representation in Family Court is not an entitlement; it requires compliance with court orders, particularly regarding child custody matters.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.