SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1895

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
India Tourism Development Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Bajaj Electricals Ltd – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shilp Agrawal & Ujjwal Jha, Advocates, for the Plaintiff.
None, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Neena Bansal Krishna, J.

I.A.13517/2019 (under Section 151 CPC for Condonation of Delay of 1 day in filing of the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996) and I.A.13519/2019 (under Section 151 CPC for Condonation of Delay of 42 days day in re-filing of the said petition)

1. The petitioner being aggrieved by some of the claims decided against it, has filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "A&C Act") against the impugned Award. However, despite due diligence and on account of bona fide reasons, the petitioner was unable to file the petition within the stipulated period of limitation. The Award was signed by the learned Arbitrator on 30th October, 2018, but since the balance fee had not been paid to the learned Arbitrator, the copy of the Award was handed over to the petitioner on 19th December, 2018 and to the respondent on 24th December, 2018. Thereafter, an application dated 02nd February, 2019 was filed for review/correction and the mandate of the Tribunal finally came to an end on 01st May, 2019 in regard to which an email was sent to the counsel by the learned Arbitrator

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top