SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1945

SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Tata Steel Bsl Limited – Appellant
Versus
Venus Recruiter Private Limited – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
V.P. Singh, Ms. Anindita Roy Chawdhury, Ms. Vatsala Rai and Ms. Simran Bhat, Advocates, for the Appellant in LPA 37/2021 AND C.M. NOS. 2664/2021, 2665/2021 & 2666/2021 AND LPA 43/2021 & LPA 43/2021 and C.M. Nos. 3196/2021 & 3198/2021.
Kapil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Ranjana Roy Gawai, Ms. Vasudha and Ms. Aarushi Tiku, Advocates, for the Respondent No.1 in LPA 37/2021 AND C.M. NOS. 2664/2021, 2665/2021 & 2666/2021 AND LPA 43/2021.
Chetan Sharma, Additional Solicitor General with Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC, Amit Gupta, Rishav Dubey, Danish Faraz Khan, Saurabh Tripathi, Sahag Garg and Aakarsh Srivastava, Advocates, for the Respondent in LPA 37/2021 AND C.M. NOS. 2664/2021, 2665/2021 & 2666/2021 AND LPA 43/2021 & LPA 43/2021 and C.M. Nos. 3196/2021 & 3198/2021.
Manmeet Singh, Ms. Nishtha Chaturvedi and Ms. Shatakshi Tripathi, Advocates, for the Respondent No.3 in LPA 37/2021 AND C.M. NOS. 2664/2021, 2665/2021 & 2666/2021 AND LPA 43/2021 & for the Respondent No.4 in LPA 43/2021 and C.M. Nos. 3196/2021 & 3198/2021.
Kapil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Rishi Agarwal, Parminder Singh and Pranjit Bhattacharya, Advocates, for the Respondent No.1 in LPA 43/2021 and C.M. Nos. 3196/2021 & 3198/2021.

JUDGMENT

1. The present Letters Patent Appeals, being LPA No. 37 & 43 of 2021 have been filed by Tata Steel BSL Ltd. (hereafter, "TSBL") and the Union of India (hereafter, "UoI") (collectively, "Appellants") respectively, impugning the Judgment and Order dated 26.11.2022 ("Impugned Judgment") rendered in W.P.(C) No. 8705 of 2019: titled Venus Recruiters Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors., wherein the Ld. Single Judge inter-alia held that an application filed under Section 43 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("IBC") for avoidance of preferential transactions cannot survive beyond the conclusion of corporate insolvency resolution process (hereafter, "CIRP"). Accordingly, the Appellants have sought before this Court that the Impugned Judgment be set aside.

2. The facts of the case leading up to the filing of the present LPAs are set out hereinbelow:

a. Upon default in repayment of its credit facilities, State Bank of India ("SBI") filed a petition, being C.P. No. (IB)-201(PB)/2017 under Section 7 of the IBC before the NCLT seeking initiation of CIRP of M/s Bhushan Steel Limited.

b. On 26.07.2017, the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi (hereafter, "NCLT") passed an or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top