SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1931

SANJEEV NARULA
Sap Se – Appellant
Versus
Raj Punarvasi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ranjan Narula and Ms. Shashi Ojha, Advocates, for the Plaintiff.
None, for the Defendant.

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)

1. Plaintiff has filed the instant suit, inter alia, seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, copyright, passing off, unfair competition, delivery up, rendition of accounts, damages, etc.

2. The case set out in Plaint is as follows:

(i) Plaintiff-`SAP SE' engaged in providing end-to-end software application solutions, is incorporated under the laws of Germany. It was established in 1972 and is the market leader in enterprise application software. It has extensive operations in India and has set up a wholly-owned subsidiary - `SAP India Private Limited'.

(ii) It has been selling and distributing its products and services under trade mark `SAP', which was coined, adopted and has been in use since 1972. Plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the mark `SAP' and its formative marks such as '[IMG]', `SAP HANA' etc. in over 75 countries, including India. Details of trademark and copyright registrations in favour of Plaintiff has been provided at paragraph no. 20 to 21 and 14 of the Plaint, respectively. Plaintiff's trademarks form an integral part of Plaintiff's trade and business. Apart from its trademark registrations, it a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top