IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.
Smt. Savita Devi – Appellant
Versus
Sh. Lalit Kumar – Respondent
Cr.M.C. 2331 of 2020 & Cr.M.A. 5396 of 2022
Decided On : 02-02-2023
Maintenance - Reduction of Maintenance Amount - DV Act, HMA - Section 12 of The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 13(1)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act - [12, 13(1)(a)] - The court discussed the provisions of the DV Act and HMA in the context of determining the maintenance amount. It highlighted the obligation of an able-bodied husband to maintain his wife and child, the consideration of income and expenses, and the interim nature of the maintenance order.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to set aside the order reducing the maintenance amount granted to her and her son. The court analyzed the income and expenses of the parties and the respondent's ability to pay maintenance.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondent's income was higher than claimed and that the petitioner's monthly expenditure was about Rs.10,500/-. It modified the orders passed by the lower courts and set the interim maintenance amount at Rs.12,000/- for the petitioner and the minor son.
Issues: Reduction of maintenance amount, consideration of income and expenses, obligation of husband to maintain wife and child.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the income and expenses of the parties, the obligation of an able-bodied husband to maintain his family, and the interim nature of the maintenance order.
Final Decision: The court modified the orders passed by the lower courts and set the interim maintenance amount at Rs.12,000/- for the petitioner and the minor son.
JUDGMENT
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J. The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C.") against the order dated 11.03.2020 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-05, South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter "learned ASJ") whereby the learned Session Judge has reduced the maintenance amount from Rs.15,000/- to Rs.10,000/- (Rs.7,000/- for Petitioner and Rs.3,000/- for the son of the parties).
2. The brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 19.02.2006 and from the wedlock, a child namely Harshit was born on 05.07.2008. It is alleged by the petitioner that respondent and his family used to ill-treat the petitioner as she had failed to fulfill their demand of dowry. In the year 2013, respondent's family allegedly threw the petitioner as well as respondent out of the matrimonial home and thereafter in 2015, respondent deserted the petitioner and returned to his parents. It is further alleged that respondent had also filed a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter "HMA") before the Family Court, Saket and petitioner had filed a complaint under Section 12 of The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter "DV Act"). The learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Mahila Court, Saket Courts (hereinafter "learned MM") vide order dated 04.02.2019 directed the respondent to pay an interim maintenance of Rs.15,000/- i.e., Rs.10,000/- to petitioner and Rs.5,000/- to their son. The relevant portion of the order dated 04.02.2019 passed by learned MM reads as under:
"...I have perused the income affidavits of both the parties and documents filed in support. Marriage between the parties and paternity of minor son is not disputed. Respondent has further not disputed that the complainant is merely 12th class, while has concealed his own specific educational qualification by vaguely stating himself to be a graduate from DU and post graduate from Himachal University without providing details of such qualifications. He has not disputed complainant to be unemployed and has claimed himself to be earning Rs.8,000/- per month as daily service executive at Uma Maheshwari Traders. He has filed an undated certificate purportedly issued by an employer to declare that he is working as such since 21.07.2015, at a salary of Rs.8,000/- per month which is even below the minimum wages prescribed under Minimum Wages Act for an uneducated unskilled labour. Even the statement of accounts filed by respondent does not show credit of any such income to his account. It is therefore difficult to believe that a hale hearty man who is admittedly a post graduate is working at a meager salary of Rs.8,000/- per month. It is pertinent to note that the bank account statement filed by him reveals a average withdrawal of Rs.10,000/- to Rs.30,000/- every month prior to the litigation. His claim to his earnings is also subsequent to the filing of the petition. His affidavit of income is also an admission of fact that he is not paying maintenance or bearing even the educational expenditure of his minor son despite claiming to be earning Rs.8,000/-. He has not produced any documents to show his educational status and thus appears to be concealing his true income. At the same time, complainant is unable to prime facie show respondent to be owner of any immovable property.
In view these facts and that the respondent is a post graduate and capable of withdrawing and expending Rs.10,000/- to Rs.30,000/- each month, his income is ascertained to be earning atleast Rs.25,000/- 30,000/- per month. Having no other liability but to maintain his legally wedded wife and minor son, respondent no. 1 is directed to pay interim month maintenance of Rs.10,000/- to complainant form the date of this order (as ad-interim maintenance was awarded vide order dated 16.07.2015) and Rs.5,000/- per
The obligation of an able-bodied husband to maintain his wife and minor child, and the consideration of income and expenses in determining the maintenance amount.
Interim maintenance – For the purposes of grant of interim maintenance, petitioner-wife cannot be presumed to be earning or being capable of maintaining herself.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of actual earnings, standard of living, and liabilities in determining the maintenance amount under the Protection of Women from Dom....
The determination of maintenance in matrimonial disputes depends on the financial status of the parties and the standard of living to which the aggrieved person is accustomed.
Grant of interim maintenance – Magistrate is required to find out what is required by wife to maintain a standard of living which is neither luxurious nor penurious but is modestly consistent with st....
The court emphasized that the interim maintenance should be adequate, fair, and reasonable, and consistent with the standard of living of the aggrieved person. The court also highlighted the presumpt....
Grant of interim maintenance – Magistrate is required to find out what is required by wife to maintain a standard of living which is neither luxurious nor penurious but is modestly consistent with st....
The obligation of the husband to maintain his wife, the consideration of minimum wage for determining the respondent's income, and the wife's capability of earning not disentitling her from maintenan....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.