IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Dharmender Gautam & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
The State & Anr. – Respondents
W.P.(Crl.) 364 of 2023
Decided On : 08-02-2023
Settlement Deed - Quashing of FIR - The court has the power to quash criminal proceedings under section 482 Cr.P.C. when the chances of conviction are bleak and a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations. In this case, the court quashed the FIR and all proceedings based on the settlement deed and amicable settlement between the parties.
Fact of the Case:
The FIR was lodged due to a personal family dispute, but the parties reached an amicable settlement. The respondent, who had filed the complaint, expressed her desire to put an end to the case, and a settlement deed was executed.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there would be no purpose in continuing with the proceedings as the parties had amicably settled the matter. Therefore, the court exercised its power under section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the FIR and all related proceedings.
Issues: The main issue was whether the court should quash the FIR and related proceedings based on the settlement between the parties.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that when the chances of conviction are bleak and a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations, it may exercise power under section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings.
Final Decision: The court quashed FIR no. 370/2021 and all other proceedings emanating therefrom based on the settlement deed and the amicable settlement between the parties.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
1. Present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No. 370/2021 registered under section 354/354(B)/324/34 IPC at Police Station Kamla Market.
2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the FIR 370/2021 was lodged on the basis of the complaint of respondent No.2/complainant. It has been stated that the FIR 370/2021 arises out of a personal family dispute wherein, some personal discord erupted and an altercation took place between the parties. The parties are closely related as petitioner Nos.1 and 3 are the cousins of the complainant whereas petitioner No.2 is the paternal uncle of the complainant.
3. It is submitted that the parties have reached at an amicable settlement. The respondent No.2 is present and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She states that she has married and now wants to put a quietus to this case. The settlement deed dated 07.01.2023 is on record and terms and conditions of the same are as follows:
"1. That the first party with his own free will and without any pressure have entered into an settlement with the second party and the first party does not want to pursue the said case against the second party before the court of law and the first party have no grievances against the second party in any manner whatsoever.
2. That it is further submitted now the matter has been settled between the parties and the first party undertakes to withdraw the same and shall not continue the said complaint against the second party.
3. That the first party shall execute and file affidavit to the effect that she would have no objection, if Hon'ble Court quashes the FIR No.370/21.
4. That the first party shall cooperate with the second party when they will file quashing petition for FIR No.370/21 before Hon'ble High Court or at the time any time as and need arises.
5. That both the parties shall refrain from lodging/pursuing any case/complaint against each other before any court or authority. Now the matter has been settled and no party can claim anything against the other party.
6. That both the parties have arrived at compromise mentioned above out of their own free will without any force and coercion from any quarter."
4. It has been repeatedly held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and this Court that when the chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak and, therefore, no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing a criminal prosecution to continue, and where the court may be of the opinion that a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations between them, the Court may exercise power under section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the proceedings or the complaint or the FIR as the case may be.
5. I consider that there would be no purpose of continuing with the proceedings. The parties have amicably settled the matter. In view of the settlement deed along with the facts and circumstances of the case, FIR no. 370/2021 registered under section 354/354(B)/324/34 IPC at PS Kamla Market and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
6. The present petition is disposed of
The court has the power to quash criminal proceedings under section 482 Cr.P.C. when the chances of conviction are bleak and a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations.
The court has the power under section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings when a settlement between parties would lead to better relations and no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing a crim....
The court may exercise the power under section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings when a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations and no useful purpose is likely to be served by allow....
The court has the inherent power under Section 482 to quash criminal proceedings based on a settlement between the parties, with the aim of achieving substantial justice and preventing abuse of the c....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to quash non-compoundable offences under section 482 of the Code, considering the nature of the offence and the amicable sett....
The power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of any court. The possibility of conviction being remote and bleak due to a sett....
In personal disputes, if matters are settled amicably, a quietus should be put, and the court may quash ongoing criminal proceedings based on such settlements.
The court has the power to quash criminal proceedings on the ground of a settlement, considering the private nature of the dispute and the amicable settlement reached by the parties.
The court may exercise power under section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the proceedings based on a settlement agreement and may impose constructive measures on the parties.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.