SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 2784

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
Aakash Varshney – Appellant
Versus
Maharashtra Feeds Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Shubhayu Roy, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
None, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Tushar Rao Gedela, J. (Oral)

[The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode]

1. After some arguments, this Court is of the opinion that the impugned order need not be interfered with, at this stage. However keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, cost of Rs.5,000/- as imposed by the learned Trial Court, appears to be on the lower side.

2. In that view of the matter, an additional cost of Rs.5,000/- be paid by the respondent to the petitioner within two weeks from today.

3. The parties are directed to complete all the pleading and filing of documents etc in the timeline as drawn by the learned Trial Court and the learned Trial Court would be at liberty to take necessary steps to ensure that the parties adhere to the timeline so drawn.

4. Learned Trial Court is requested to expedite the hearing of the suit being CS DJ No. 343/2019 titled `Dr Aakash Varshney

vs M/s Maharashtra Feeds Pvt Ltd & Anr.' and endeavor to complete the proceedings within 12 months from today.

5. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top