IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Shubham Sharma & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State of Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 152 of 2022
Decided On : 14-02-2023
498A/406/34 IPC - Matrimonial Dispute - HMA - Contempt of Court 1971 - Settlement agreement between parties - Quashing of FIR No. 001/2021 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed for quashing of FIR No. 001/2021 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Shastri Park, Delhi, based on a settlement agreement with the respondent, his ex-wife. The marriage ended in divorce, and the parties settled all disputes, with the petitioner agreeing to pay a settlement amount to the respondent.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the parties had settled all their disputes, the marriage had ended in divorce, and the respondent voluntarily agreed to the settlement. The court considered it better to put an end to the dispute in view of the settlement and the previous grant of divorce.
Issues: Quashing of FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC based on settlement agreement, voluntary agreement of the respondent, and the previous grant of divorce.
Ratio Decidendi: Cases arising out of matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement. The court considered the settlement agreement, voluntary agreement of the respondent, and the previous grant of divorce in quashing the FIR.
Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR No. 001/2021 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Shastri Park, Delhi, based on the settlement agreement and the voluntary agreement of the respondent. The present petition stands disposed of.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.A. 584/2022 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 152/2022
1. The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No. 001/2021 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Shastri Park, Delhi. The said FIR was lodged at the complaint of the respondent No.2/wife.
2. Facts in brief are that the marriage between the petitioner No.1 namely Mr. Shubham Sharma and Respondent No.2/complainant was solemnized on 19.11.2018 as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Agra. No child was born out of this wedlock. Thereafter owing to temperamental differences both the parties started residing separately since 16.11.2019. Consequently, respondent no. 2/complainant lodged a complaint, basis which, the present FIR against the petitioners herein came to be registered. It has been submitted that the matter is now pending adjudication.
3. The marriage between the parties could not succeed and mutual divorce petition was filed and decree of divorce was granted vide order dated 03.02.2023 by the learned Principal Judge, Family Courts, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. With the help of family members and well-wishers the parties settled all their disputes and arrived at a settlement deed dated 24.09.2021 on the following terms and conditions:
"1. That it is hereby agreed that the Party of the First Part will pay a sum of Rupees 90 lacs (Rs.Ninety Lacs) as a settlement amount to Second Party which will be her alimony/maintenance past present and future and the Second Party hereby agrees not to claim any amounts from First Party or any of his family members in future on the receipt of the same.
2. It is hereby now agreed between the Parties that the amount of Rs.90 lacs (Rs.Ninety Lacs) as final settlement towards permanent alimony past present and future to be paid by Party of the First Part to the Party of the Second Part shall be paid as hereunder:
3. That the first Party undertakes and assures that the sums to be paid by cheque by the Party of the First Part to the Party of the second Part would be cleared without any hindrance or obstacles and any issue arising with the clearance of the cheques would be resolved by the Party of the First Part immediately.
4. That the Party of the Second Part is in possession of all her jewellery/istriDhan/articles/clothing/household goods etc. and their remains nothing to be taken or given by the Parties and no movable articles of any nature whatsoever of each other is lying with either of the parties and no claim shall be made by either party against each other on any account whatsoever.
5. That the Parties have filed various cases against each other listed as hereunder:
a) Complaint case in CC no 635 of 2020 under the PWDV Act as filed by the Second Party pending in the court of Ms. Vijayshree Rathore, MM mahila Court, karkadoma, Delhi.
b) Transfer Petition in SLP No. 1057/2020 pending in the Supreme Court of India as
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to rest when genuine settlements are reached, as emphasized in previous judgments.
The voluntary and amicable nature of a settlement in cases arising from matrimonial differences can be a basis for quashing non-compoundable offences under relevant legal provisions.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement, and the court should ensure that the settlement is voluntary and without coercion.
The importance of amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and the court's power to quash proceedings under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to rest if the parties have arrived at a genuine settlement.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement, and provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, allow for divorce by mutual consent.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the significance of genuine settlements in matrimonial disputes and the court's discretion to quash legal proceedings based on such settlements.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to rest through genuine settlements, and the rights of children born out of the wedlock should be protected.
Cases arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement, as held in B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa, ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.