SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 2599

MANMOHAN, SAURABH BANERJEE
Sonal Kanodia – Appellant
Versus
Ram Gupta – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr.Akhil Sharma, Advocate, for the Appellant.
Mr.Anil Kumar Sahu with Mr.Roshan Kumar, Advocates, for R-1.

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J.:

C.M.No.8142/2023

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

FAO (COMM) 43/2023

1. Present appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 17th December, 2022 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court)04, Shahdara, KKD, Delhi in the Commercial Suit being CS (COMM) No.506/2021, whereby the application of the Appellant under Order VII Rule(s) 10 and 11 CPC has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the Appellant states that the Trial Court lacks the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit as the Appellant/Defendant No.1 does not have any business within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court and no cause of action has arisen in favour of the Respondent/Plaintiff No.1 within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court. He states that the Trial Court has failed to appreciate that neither the Respondent/Plaintiff No.1 nor the Appellant/defendant No.1 have their head office in New Delhi and that both the Respondent/Plaintiff No.1 and Appellant/Defendant No.1 have their offices in Kanpur as they are running and operating their businesses from Kanpur.

3. Learned counsel for the Appellant s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top