IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Praful Jain – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
Cr.M.C. 714 of 2022
Decided On : 23-02-2023
Passport Release - Criminal Procedure - The court granted the petitioner's request to release his passport for business purposes while subject to seeking permission from the trial court before traveling abroad.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought the release of his passport for business purposes, which had been deposited with the trial court as a condition of his bail.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that releasing the passport would serve the interest of justice and balance the rights of the parties, but required the petitioner to seek permission from the trial court before traveling abroad.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be allowed to have his passport released for business purposes and travel abroad while subject to certain conditions.
Ratio Decidendi: The court balanced the interests of justice and the rights of the parties by granting the release of the passport while imposing the condition that the petitioner must seek permission from the trial court before traveling abroad.
Final Decision: The court granted the petitioner's request to release his passport but required him to seek permission from the trial court before traveling abroad.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--Present petition has been filed seeking the following prayers:
"i. Direct the Ld. Spl.Judge (PC ACT)CBI-21, Rouse Avenue Courts, New Delhi (herein referred as Ld. Trial Court) to release the passport of the petitioner/accused Praful jain Passport bearing no. T3147992 in FIR No. RC AC.1 2018 A0012/2018 P.S. CBI/AC-1.
ii. And further be pleased to allow the petitioner to travel abroad on business purpose till the final disposal of the present case subject to such terms and conditions, Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court in Bail Appl. No.1742/2018 titled as Praful Jain vs. Central Bureau of Investigation was pleased to grant bail to the petitioner, however, bail was granted subject to the condition that the petitioner will not leave the country and if he possesses a passport, the same shall be deposited before the Trial Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance to the orders of this Court, the passport of the petitioner bearing No.T3147992 was deposited with the learned Trial Court.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in the business of construction and sometimes he is required to travel at a very short notice and therefore his passport may be released and the condition regarding seeking permission may also be diluted. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to visit abroad with intimation to the learned Trial Court.
4. Learned special counsel for the CBI has opposed the prayer of the petitioner. Learned special counsel for CBI submits that the bail granted to the petitioner was subject to the condition that he will not leave the country and he will deposit the passport before the learned Trial Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the conditions may not be there.
5. I consider that interest of justice would be served and the rights of the parties would be balanced if the passport of the petitioner bearing No.T3147992 deposited before the learned Trial Court is released to the petitioner. Accordingly, the passport bearing No.T3147992 be released to the petitioner and copy of the same be retained by the learned Trial Court. However, the petitioner shall seek the permission of the learned Trial Court before visiting abroad.
6. With these directions, the present petition stands disposed of.
The fundamental right to travel and its significance in the context of curtailment of liberty.
The court held that the risk of flight must be objectively assessed based on the petitioner's conduct and history of compliance, not solely on allegations of economic offences.
The main legal point established is that surrendering passports as a bail condition does not amount to impounding, and the court should consider the social value of the freedom to go abroad and the h....
The right to travel for legitimate business needs is fundamental and cannot be denied without substantial reasons, especially when compliance with bail conditions is demonstrated.
The fundamental right to travel abroad should not be deprived except by a just, fair, and reasonable procedure, as per the principles established by various judgments.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.