IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
V. Kameswar Rao, Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, JJ.
R. K. Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 7273 of 2022
Decided On : 24-02-2023
Disqualification - Cooperative Society - Rule 20(1)(c)(i) of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, 2007 - Ishwar Nagar Cooperative Housing Building Society Vs. Parma Nand Sharma (2020) 14 SCC 230
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, Shri R.K. Aggarwal, challenged the order of the Financial Commissioner setting aside the Registrar's order and disqualifying him from the New Indraprastha Cooperative House Building Society Ltd. The petitioner had been expelled but reinstated by court orders. The Financial Commissioner held him disqualified under Rule 20 of the Delhi Cooperative Society Rules, 2007.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's entitlement to a plot related back to his original membership in 1968 and that he was senior to the claimant, respondent No.3. The court also noted that the petitioner did not incur any disqualification under Rule 20(1)(c)(i) of the DCS Rules, 2007. The Financial Commissioner's order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for further consideration.
Issues: The issues included the disqualification of the petitioner, the ownership of residential properties, and the interpretation of Rule 20(1)(c)(i) of the DCS Rules, 2007.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner did not incur any disqualification under Rule 20(1)(c)(i) of the DCS Rules, 2007, and that the Financial Commissioner's order was not based on relevant legal principles. The court also emphasized the need for a proper examination of the issues and a remand for further consideration.
Final Decision: The court set aside the Financial Commissioner's order and remanded the matter for further consideration.
JUDGMENT
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J.
1. A Writ Petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner for setting aside order dated 28.04.2022 passed by the Financial Commissioner (FC) Delhi in Revision Petition No.57/2014 titled Alok Jain Vs. Registrar, Cooperative Societies and Ors. whereby the Financial Commissioner set aside the order dated 18.12.2013/26.12.2013 passed by the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Delhi. Vide the impugned order, the Financial Commissioner held the petitioner herein (Shri R.K. Aggarwal) to be disqualified under Rule 20 of the Delhi Cooperative Society Rules, 2007.
2. In brief, as per the case of the petitioner, he had applied for and had become member of the New Indraprastha Cooperative House Building Society Ltd. (respondent No.2) in the year 1968. Though the petitioner was expelled by the respondent No.2/Society but eventually the same was set aside by the Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 29.07.1991 in LPA No.97/1983. The judgment passed by the Division Bench in LPA No.97/1983 was challenged by the Society/respondent No.2 by filing of Special Leave Petition before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India which was dismissed vide order dated 10.02.1992.
3. It is further the case of the petitioner that Shri V.K. Jain, a waiting list member of the Society/respondent No.2 filed a Writ Petition (CW No.1678/1992) before the High Court of Delhi seeking directions, inter alia, against respondent No.2/Society to give possession to him of Plot No.90 measuring 150 sq. yds. of the Society and to restrain the Society from giving possession of the plot to any other person including the petitioner herein. During the pendency of the said Writ Petition, said Shri V.K. Jain expired on 29.07.1996 and was substituted by his wife Ms. Sneh Lata Jain. The said Writ Petition was dismissed /disposed by the Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.08.2010.
4. It may be appropriate to refer at this stage itself that the Division Bench vide aforesaid judgment dated 16.08.2010 noticed that Shri R.K. Aggarwal continued to be a member of the Society and his entitlement would relate back to the year 1968 when he became a member of the Society and would thus rank senior to Shri V.K. Jain. Further, as on said date only one plot of land which has to be allotted is Plot No.90 measuring 150 sq. yds. Further, if a member who expelled, regains the membership through a judicial order the person concerned regains his seniority and the person who is pushed out is not the one who was inducted against the resultant vacancy but the one who is at the bottom of the seniority list. It was further observed that it may have happened that since a single plot was left for allotment inter se Shri V.K. Jain and Shri R.K Aggarwal, the entitlement would be flowing seniority-wise and would go to Shri R.K. Aggarwal. Further, the Division Bench did not opine upon the third contention pertaining to Shri R.K. Aggarwal being otherwise disentitled to be allotted any plot since there were no pleadings to this effect. The issue as regards the same was accordingly not decided and left open, if permissible in law by filing of appropriate petition before the Registrar, Cooperative Societies.
5. Thereafter, Ms. Sneh Lata Jain filed an application under Section 41(1) and Section 87 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 read with Rule 20, 35 and 100 of the DCS Rules, 2007 seeking cessation of the membership of the petitioner with respondent No.2 Society, claiming to be nominee of Shri V.K. Jain and on the basis of the Will left by the deceased. The disqualification was sought under Rule 20 of DCS Rules, 2007 on the grounds that the petitioner and his sons were the owner of House No.M-109, Block M, Saket, New Delhi; House No.88, Sainik Farms, Khanpur, Delhi and another Flat at N-1, NDSE-I, New Delhi.
6. The said application filed by Ms. Sneh Lata Jain was dismissed by the Registrar, Coope
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Rule 20(1)(c)(i) of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, 2007, in determining the disqualification of a mem....
Under Rule 25 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, financial dependency, including for adult children, disqualifies individuals from membership to prevent multiple land allotments within familie....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that fraudulent and illegal acquisition of membership and possession in a cooperative society, including suppression of material facts and circumve....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the impugned notices issued by the Society were valid, as the petitioner failed to fulfill the obligation to undertake construction within the....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a member of a housing society is not liable for payment of dues after transferring the plot to another society, as per Section 73CA(1)(e) of t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.