Rahul Dayaram Bhashakar vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Del) 1154

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Rahul Dayaram Bhashakar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr.A.K. Singh & Mr.Kamlesh Kamal, Advocates , for the Petitioner.
Mr.Syed Abdul Haseeb & Ms.Prerna Dhall, Advocates, for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT (oral)

CM APPL. 10961/2023 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application is accordingly disposed of.

W.P.(C) 2845/2023

3. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks directions to respondent no.2 to re-fix the correct seniority of the petitioner in the rank of Inspector/GD at par with his batch-mate respondent no.3. Further seeks directions to correct the seniority of the petitioner in the rank of Assistant Commandant with consequential benefits.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that for the aforesaid relief(s), petitioner made representation dated NIL to Director General/CRPF which is annexed with the present petition as Annexure P-10, however, till date, the said representation has not been decided by the respondents.

5. In view of above, we hereby direct the competent authority/DG(CRPF) to decide the abovementioned representation filed by the petitioner within eight weeks from today and communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner in writing within one week thereafter with a reasoned order.

6. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is disposed of.

7. Needless to say, if the petitioner feels aggr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document