CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Anarock Property Consultants Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Guru Raghavendra Infra Developers Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral)--The instant petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter "The Act, 1996") has been filed on behalf of petitioner seeking the appointment of arbitrator.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 1002, 10th Floor, B Wing, ONE BKC. G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, and was formerly known as Janes Lang LaSalle Residential Pvt Ltd.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Arbitration Clause contained in Clause 12 of the Agreement states that differences between the parties shall be adjudicated in Arbitration, in accordance with the provisions of the Act, 1996.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the parties in dispute entered into the Agreement on 22nd February 2016 whereby the petitioner was appointed by the respondent on an exclusive basis to provide marketing services to market and promote the project names `Guru Raghavendra's Royal Palms'. It is further submitted that under the said Agreement, the petitioner was required to perform functions
The court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between parties when there is an agreement to refer the disputes to arbit....
The court's decision emphasized the arbitrability of disputes and the appointment of a sole arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Premature petitions under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, are not maintainable when a Sole Arbitrator has already been appointed, and unresponsiveness of the current Arbitra....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint a Sole Arbitrator and refer disputes arising from a tender to Arbitration in accordance with the provisions of....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to refer disputes to arbitration when both parties have invoked the arbitration clause and there are admitted arbitral disput....
The court can appoint an Arbitrator when parties fail to mutually agree, as per agreement provisions and arbitration law.
The court appointed an arbitrator as the parties consented to arbitration under the existing arbitration clause, complying with statutory requirements.
The presence of an arbitration clause in an agreement, the arbitrability of disputes, and the fulfillment of necessary requisites under the Arbitration Act influence the court's decision to appoint a....
Appointment of an arbitrator in instances where the respondent does not object to arbitration is valid under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing the importance of efficient dispute reso....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.