Saurabh Shukla vs Max Bupa Health Insurance Co. Ltd.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Del) 918

PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Saurabh Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Max Bupa Health Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Siddharth Nath & Ms. Khushboo Hora, Advocates, for the Petitioner in W.P.(C) 6074 of 2019.
Mr. Pradeep K Bakshi, Advocate, for the Respondent-1 in W.P.(C) 6074 of 2019.
Mr. Rajiv Jaiswal, Advocate, for the Respondent-2 in W.P.(C) 6074 of 2019.
Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dipak K Nag & Mr. Fahad Imtiaz, Advocates, for the Respondent-3 in W.P.(C) 6074 of 2019.
Shyam D. Nandan, Advocate, for the Petitioner in W.P.(C) 9310/2020.
Mr. Arvind Minocha, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sachin Daga, Mr. Rajesh Kandari & Ms. Kajal Bhandari, Advocates, for the Respondent-1 in W.P.(C) 9310/2020.
Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Nanda, Mr. Nimish Kumar and Ms. Shreya Singh Advocates, for the Respondent-3 in W.P.(C) 9310/2020.
Mr Subhash Tanwar, CGSC with Mr. Ashish Choudhary, Advocate, for the UOI in W.P.(C) 9310/2020.

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

C.M No. 12950/2023 in W.P.(C) 6074/2019

2. At the outset, Mr. Pradeep K Bakshi, ld. Counsel for Respondent No. 1 submits that name of Max Bupa Health. Co. Ltd, Respondent No. 1 has been changed to Niva Bupa Health Insurance Company Limited (hereinafter `Niva Bupa'). Therefore, an application being C.M. No. 12950/2023 which is not listed today has been moved for change of name of Respondent No. 1.

3. Let the said application be brought on record. Considering that the same is a formal application, the application is allowed.

4. The name of the Respondent No. 1 shall now be reflected as Niva Bupa Health Insurance Company Limited. The amended memo of parties be filed by the Petitioner within one week.

W.P.(C) 6074/2019

5. The present petition has been preferred by Mr. Saurabh Shukla who is suffering from Tetraplegia and paralysis below his chest due to a spinal cord injury which he had suffered in 2011. His physical condition is such that he is confined to a wheelchair and has limited use of his arms. Despite this injury, as recorded in the previous order, he is an investment banking professional,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Del) 918

PRATHIBA M. SINGHSaurabh Shukla – AppellantVersusMax Bupa Health Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent

PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Saurabh Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Max Bupa Health Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent