Back
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Ashima Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Reserve Bank of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J. (Oral)
CM APPL. 15420/2023(for exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application is disposed of.
W.P.(C) 3953/2023 and CM APPL. 15419/2023
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:
"(i) direct respondent no. 1 in exercise its power U/s 45 (JA) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 to require respondent no. 2 to adhere to NPA norms applicable to MSME loan account, before deciding non-performing assets (NPA) in face of its Covid-19 pandemic directives and regulatory package directed to be drawn in accordance with Hon'ble Apex Court judgment circulated vide its circular dated 07.04.2021 (Annexure-G)
(ii) Set-aside/quash respondent no.2's order dated 16.06.2021 (Annexure-I) being non-speaking non- reasoned and in violation, disregard to respondent no.1's directives applicable to MSMEs sector;
(iii) direct respondent no. 2 to draw One Time Settlement in respect to petitioner loan account by enabling petitioner to deposit the same considering petitioner's property valued to be substantially & significantly much more than amount recoverable by respondent no.2 and payable by pe
The entitlement for any benefit under the circulars issued by the RBI can be adjudicated by the concerned DRT, and a writ petition against a private financial institution under Article 226 of the Con....
Point of law: Supreme Court held that if a borrower is aggrieved by any of actions of private bank or ARC, it has to avail remedy under SARFAESI Act; no writ petition would lie and/or would be mainta....
Point of law: Loans by financial institutions are granted from public money generated at the taxpayer’s expense. Such loan does not become the property of the person taking the loan, but retains its ....
A writ petition is maintainable against a scheduled bank under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, as the bank is performing public functions and is governed by the provisions of the Banking Re....
A proceeding initiated under SARFAESI Act and/or any proposed action is to be taken and borrower is aggrieved by any of actions of bank, borrower has to avail remedy under SARFAESI Act and no writ pe....
No borrower has a vested right to compel a bank to accept a One Time Settlement, as banks retain discretion in recovery matters.
The classification of a borrower's account as NPA under the SARFAESI Act is not justiciable in writ jurisdiction until measures under section 13(4) are invoked, necessitating the exhaustion of statut....
The High Court should not adjudicate on the classification of NPA, and recovery proceedings should not be halted by exercising power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Borrowers have remedies under Section 13(3A) and Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to challenge NPA classification and appeal actions taken by the bank.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
