SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1372

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Abhishek Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 4972 of 2023 & CM APPL. 19393 of 2023
Decided On : 19-04-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr.Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Sh.Hemendra Singh, Deputy Commandant (Law) BSF, for the Respondent.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of Rule 167(2) of the BSF Rules and the court's direction to the respondents to decide the petition within a specified timeframe.

Headnote:

Rule 167(2) - BSF Rules - The court directed the respondents to treat the present petition as a petition under Rule 167(2) of the BSF Rules filed by the petitioner and decide the same within two weeks from the date of the judgment.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to quash an order passed by the Summary Security Force Court and the dismissal of their application for suspension of sentence.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the respondents to treat the present petition as a petition under Rule 167(2) of the BSF Rules and decide the same within two weeks, with communication of the decision to the petitioner within two days thereafter.

Issues: Petitioner's request to quash the SSFC order and the dismissal of their application for suspension of sentence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the petitioner's submission to treat the present petition as a petition under Rule 167(2) of the BSF Rules, leading to the court's direction to the respondents to decide the petition within a specified timeframe.

Final Decision: The present petition and pending applications were disposed of with directions to the respondents to treat the petition as per Rule 167(2) of the BSF Rules and decide it within the specified timeframe.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, petitioner prays as under:

i. To call for records and quash the order dated 16.02.2023 passed by Summary Security Force Court at BN HQ, 157 BN BSF, Gopalpur, Cooch Behar, West Bengal which was counter-signed by the DIG SHQ BSF, Gopalpur on 22.03.2023;

ii. To call for records and quash the order dated 13.04.2023 whereby petitioner's application for suspension of sentence was dismissed.

2. Notice issued.

3. Sh.Hemendra Singh, Deputy Commandant (Law) BSF appears for the respondents on advance notice, has pointed out that against the SSFC proceedings dated 16.02.2023, till date, petitioner has not filed any petition under Rule 167(2) of the BSF Rules.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner at this stage submits that let the present petition be treated as a petition filed under Rule 167(2) and the respondents may be directed to decide the same in time bound manner.

5. Accordingly, we hereby dispose of the present petition by giving directions to the respondents to treat the present petition as a petition under Rule 167(2) of the BSF Rules filed by the petitioner and decide the same within two weeks from today and communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner within two days' thereafter with reasoned order.

6. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition and pending applications are disposed of.

7. Needless to say, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision of the respondents, he may approach the appropriate forum.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top