SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4533

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
Hugo Boss Trademark Management Gmbh And Co Kg – Appellant
Versus
Hertz Chemicals Pvt Ltd & Anr. – Respondents
CS(COMM) 297 of 2023 & I.As. 9064-9070 of 2023
Decided On : 11-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Shravan Kumar Bansal, Mr. Rishi Bansal and Ms. Aishwarya Debadarshini, Advocates, for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sachin Gupta, Mr. Rohit Pradhan and Mr. Asavari Jain, Advocates, for the Defendants.

The defendant's affidavit stating the discontinuation of products bound the defendant and led to the decree in favor of the plaintiff.

Headnote:

Decree - Discontinuation of Products - The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff based on the defendant's affidavit stating the discontinuation of the products in question.

Fact of the Case:

The defendant submitted an affidavit stating the discontinuation of certain products, leading the plaintiff to agree to close the proceedings and the court to decree the suit in favor of the plaintiff.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the defendant's affidavit regarding the discontinuation of products rendered the grievance in the suit unnecessary for adjudication, leading to the decree in favor of the plaintiff.

Issues: Discontinuation of products, agreement to close proceedings, and refund of court fees.

Ratio Decidendi: The defendant's affidavit stating the discontinuation of products bound the defendant and led to the decree in favor of the plaintiff.

Final Decision: The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, and the plaintiff was entitled to a refund of court fees, if any.

ORDER (Oral)

C. Hari Shankar, J.

1. The dispute in this case relates to the following four products of the defendant, as depicted in para 65 of the plaint:

[IMG]

2. After Mr. Bansal argued the matter for some time, Mr. Akhil Sibal, learned Senior Counsel for Defendant 1, at that point, interceded to state that of the following products in question, his client has discontinued manufacture and export of the second product:

[IMG]

3. An affidavit, to the said effect, has also been tendered across the Bar. Apropos the first, third and fourth products, the affidavit states that Defendant 1 has decided to discontinue manufacture and export of the said products as well.

4. Mr. Sibal submits that the said affidavit is being filed without prejudice and subject to the plaintiff's agreeing to close the present proceedings and to a disposal of the suit on the basis of the said affidavit.

5. The affidavit dated 11th May 2023 is reproduced, in extenso, as under:

    "AFFIDAVIT OF NAZNEEN WIFE OF SUNIL SEWHANI, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, AT THE ADDRESS RAHEJA XION UNIT NO. 301, 3RD FLOOR JETHA COMPOUND, DR. B. A.ROAD, MAZGAON, BYCULLA EAST MUMBAI-400027

    PRESENTLY AT NEW DELHI

    I do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:

    1. I say that I am one of the directors of the Defendant Company and fully aware of the facts and the circumstances of this present case. I am competent to swear and depose this present affidavit.

    2. I state that the impugned trade mark bottle namely CEO VIP has been discontinued way back in October 2018.

    3. Without prejudice to our rights and contentions, I state that in the spirit of settlement and early resolution of the present suit, the Defendant company has decided to discontinue manufacturing and export of the other impugned trade mark bottles, namely, CEO VIP PRIVE, CEO ULTIMATE, and CEO NIGHT."

    4. In view of the above, it is most respectfully prayed that the present suit may kindly be disposed off.

Deponent

    Verification:

    Verified at New Delhi on this 11th day of May 2023 that the contents of the above affidavit are true and correct, that no part of it is false and nothing material or relevant has been concealed therefrom.

Deponent"

6. Mr. Bansal, on instructions, submits that, in view of the aforesaid affidavit and binding Defendant 1 thereby, the grievance in the present suit does not survive for adjudication and that his client is not intending to press the other reliefs contained in the plaint.

7. Let the plaint be registered as a suit.

8. In view thereof, it is not necessary to issue formal summons in the suit.

9. The suit stands decreed by binding Defendant 1 to the contents of the affidavit dated 11th May 2023, reproduced in extenso hereinabove.

10. The registry is directed to draw up a decree sheet accordingly.

11. The plaintiff would be entitled to refund of court fees, if any, deposited by it.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top