SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4509

REKHA PALLI
Geeta Devi – Appellant
Versus
Kavita – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Tushar Bathija, Mr. Abhimanyu Tewari and Ms. Eliza, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sameer Nandwani and Ms. Pooja Tandon, Advocates, for R-3.

JUDGMENT

Rekha Palli, J. (Oral)

MAC.APP. 914/2019

1. The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 preferred by the owner of the offending vehicle seeks to assail the award dated 06.07.2018 passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal in MACT No. 4415/2016 insofar as it grants recovery rights in favour of the insurer/respondent no.3.

2. Vide the impugned award, the learned Tribunal held that since the driving licence held by the driver of the insured vehicle, i.e., respondent no.2 was fake, there was a breach of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy and therefore the insurer was entitled to a right of recovery against the appellant.

3. The primary submission of Mr. Tushar Bathija, learned counsel for the appellant is that not only was the driving license of the respondent no.2 which, was later found to be fake, duly verified by her late husband at the time of engaging him but he had even taken a driving test of respondent no.2 and had found him fit for driving. The late husband of the appellant, having taken all possible steps to check that the driver was holding a valid license and was fit to drive the vehicle; even if the said license

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top