Back
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Unikil Pesticides Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J. (Oral)
LPA 530/2022
1. Regard being head to similitude in the controversy involved in both the LPAs, they were heard together and a common judgment is being passed. The facts of the LPA 530/2022 are being dealt with as under.
2. The Appellant before this Court has filed this present Appeal under Clause 10 of Letters Patent being aggrieved by an order dated 10.02.2020 passed by the Learned Single Judge in W.P.(C.) No. 6092/2013 titled Unikil Pesticides Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Anr..
3. The facts of the case reveal that the Writ Petition was preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the Appellant herein being aggrieved by an order dated 10.07.2013 and a prayer was made to issue Registration Certificate to the Appellant for "Imazathapyr molecule" under Section 9(4) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereinafter to be referred as `Insecticides Act.).
4. The facts of the case further reveal that the Appellant, as stated by him, is a leading manufacturer/formulator of pesticides, insecticides, wedicides and other biocides in the State of Madhya Pradesh having a factory situated at Industrial Estate Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh.
5. Th
Interim order deciding merits without counter-affidavit is appealable judgment under Letters Patent; Sections 9(3) and 9(3B) of Insecticides Act apply distinctly.
The absence of fraudulent intent and the availability of alternative remedies under the Insecticides Act preclude criminal liability under IPC Section 420.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of prior registration for the import of Ethephon under the Insecticides Act and the burden of proof on the petitioner to establish ....
The manufacturers of insecticides have a right to retest the insecticides by the CIL under Section 24(4) of the Insecticides Act, 1968, and if they are deprived of this right, the proceedings against....
A licensed dealer of insecticides is protected under Section 30(3) of the Insecticides Act, 1968, and cannot be penalized without evidence of wrongdoing.
The court ruled that the limitation period for filing a complaint under the Insecticides Act begins from the date the Government Analyst's report is received, not from the sample collection date.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the period of limitation for filing a complaint under the Insecticides Act commences from the date of receipt of the analyst's report, and the....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
