SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4566

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Karan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
None, for the Appellants.
Mr.Rajkumar, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J.

1. By way of present appeal filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (hereinafter, referred to as the `Act'), the appellants/claimants have assailed the order dated 07.02.2017 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi in Claim Application No. OA (II u) 142/2015 whereby the claim application filed on behalf of the appellants was dismissed.

2. On the last date of hearing, noticing the continued absence of the appellants and their counsel, default notices were issued. Despite being served, the appellants remain unrepresented.

3. The Court with the assistance of learned counsel for the respondent, has gone through the entire material placed on record, which reveals that the claim application was filed before the Appellate Tribunal, thereby claiming that on 25.06.2014, the appellants' son undertook a train journey from Amroha to Delhi via Sitapur City Delhi passenger train No. 54075 after purchasing a valid journey ticket. It was further claimed that on account of sudden jerk, he fell from the moving train at Amroha. Though, the body was found lying on the railway track, upon search no journey ticket was recovere

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top