Back
NAJMI WAZIRI, SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Vineet Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Reserve Bank of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Najmi Waziri, J. (Oral)
The hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode (physical and virtual hearing).
1. The learned counsel for Resolution Professional (`RP') submits that it appears that Flat No. F-1002, AVJ Heights, Zeta-I, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, have been allotted twice over and the petitioner is the second alottee. The matter is under examination before the Principal Bench, NCLT, New Delhi.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no rational person would pay monies for purchase of property, encumbered or which otherwise has already been sold.
3. The final order dated 09.03.2020 in O.A. No. 751/2016 passed by DRT-II, New Delhi directs inter-alia as under:
"...
11. In the light of the above discussions, the OA deserves to be allowed against the defendant Nos. 1 to 3, whose liability is joint and several.
ORDER
(i) I allow this OA and direct the defendants Nos. 1 to 3, jointly and severally, to pay the sum of Rs. 62,23,133/- (Rupees Sixty Two Lakhs, Twenty Three Thousand, One Hundred and Thirty Three only) along with costs & pendentelite and future interest @ 10.0 % per annum from the date of filling the present OA, till its realization in full. T
The rights of the second allottee and the recovery process in case of default by the developer were central to the court's decision.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that in cases of loan agreements for property development, recovery should first be sought from the property developer and land owner, with the pet....
The court's decision emphasized the principle that no recovery liability can be fastened upon the petitioner until the proceedings have been exhausted, and the petitioner's right to pursue remedies w....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the liability of the defendants for non-payment and violation of agreements, leading to the entitlement of the applicant bank to recover a specific....
The court emphasized that the petitioner would have the liberty to file a response/reply at the appropriate stage and pursue available legal remedies, and would not be required to make any payments u....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of upholding consent terms, the obligations of the parties, and preventing deliberate obstruction of recovery proceedings.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Recovery Officer should not proceed with the execution of the recovery certificate after a stay has been granted by a superior court, and ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
