SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4203

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Siddharth Mridul, Talwant Singh, JJ.
Imran Ali – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 6992 of 2023 & CM APPL. 27193 of 2023 (for direction)
Decided On : 22-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ram Narayan Singh and Mr. Anand Chandra Shailani, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Standing Counsel (Civil), for R-1 & R-3/GNCTD.
Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC along with Ms. Devika Mohan, Ms. Harshita Gupta and Mr. Shubham Kumar Mishra, Advocates, for R-2/NDMC.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to issue a writ of mandamus and the application of the provisions of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act 2014.

Headnote:

Mandamus - Street Vendors - The court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the Town Vending Committee to determine the petitioner's representation in accordance with the law.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ to prevent dispossessing or obstructing the petitioner from carrying on trade and to conduct a survey for issuing a certificate of vending in favor of the petitioner.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the Town Vending Committee to determine the petitioner's representation dated 11.05.2023 in accordance with the law.

Issues: The issues involved the petitioner's right to carry on trade and the conduct of a survey for issuing a certificate of vending.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the provisions of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act 2014, the Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Rules, 2017, and The Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Scheme, 2019.

Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the Town Vending Committee to determine the petitioner's representation in accordance with the law.

JUDGMENT

Siddharth Mridul, J. (Open Court)

1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been instituted on behalf of the petitioner, praying as follows:

    "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, or direction:

    A. Direct the Respondents not to dispossess or obstruct or disturb the Petitioners in carrying on his trade from his site i.e. Near A-Block, Pillanji village, Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi-110023, in terms of section 3(3) of the street vendors {Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending} Act 2014 and;

    B. Direct the Respondents/Town Vending Committee to conduct the survey of the Petitioner within time bound manner and to issue certificate of vending in favour of the Petitioner as per the provisions of the Street Vendors {protection of livelihood and regulation of street vending} Act 2014.

    Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may be granted in favour of the Petitioner, keeping in view overall facts and circumstances and also in the interest of justice."

2. Issue notice.

3. Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel (Civil) accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 3/GNCTD and Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, learned Additional Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No.2/NDMC.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, limits the relief in the present writ petition, in relation to the prayer clause (B) (extracted herein above), of the present writ petition; and to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.05.2023, which is annexed as Annexure P-3, to the present writ petition, at the time the TVC carry out the subject survey, in accordance with law.

5. Accordingly, it is relevant to highlight that this Court, vide order dated 16.02.2023, issued certain directions to the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) and GNCTD in W.P. (C) 12459/2022, titled as `Bacchu Singh Paharia Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.'; which will extend to the present petitioner, as well, with equal force and vigour. The order dated 16.02.2023, passed in W.P. (C) 12459/2022, titled as `Bacchu Singh Paharia Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.' is extracted herein below, in toto:

    `The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been instituted on behalf of the petitioner, praying as follows:

    "It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:

    a) Direct the Respondent no. 1 and 2 allow the petitioner to operate at his given vending site i.e. Near Shop No.36, Sarojini Nagar Market New Delhi till the final decision taken by the Town Vending Committee after completion of Survey.

    b) Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Pass such other or further orders, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

    Mr. Gautam Narayan, learned Additional Standing Counsel (Civil) appearing on behalf of the GNCTD states that the survey to be conducted by the duly constituted Town Vending Committee, shall commence forthwith, in accordance with the provisions of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street vending) Act 2014, as well as the Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of livelihood and regulation of street vending) Rules, 2017 and The Government of National Capital territory of Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of livelihood and regulation of street vending) Scheme, 2019.

    Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of NDMC states, that they shall render assistance, as may be required by the GNCTD, in this behalf.

    Directed accordingly.

    No further relief is prayed for.

    With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Pending applications also stand disposed of.

    Copy of the order be given dasti to learned counsel appearing on behalf of the pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top