Back
C. HARI SHANKAR
Hari Chand Shri Gopal – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh And Company Through Its Proprietor Mr. Dinesh Chandra Gupta – Respondent
JUDGMENT (Oral)
CS(COMM) 758/2022, I.A. 17834/2022 (Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC) I.A. 17835/2022 (Order XXVI Rules 4, 9 and 10 of the CPC), I.A. 17836/2022(Order XI Rule 1(6) of the CPC) and I.A. 21728/2022 (Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC)
1. The disputes between the parties stand settled with the intervention of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. Settlement Agreement dated 27th March 2023 has been placed on record. The terms of settlement read thus:
"1. The Defendant acknowledges the Plaintiff to be the registered proprietor and prior user of the trademark "GOPAL"(in English and Hindi) by itself or accompanied by numerals or in conjunction with other words or variants including but not limited to GOPAL GRENE, GOPAL GOLD, DELUXE GOPAL ZARDA GRENE, GOPAL 100, GOPAL ZARDA 100, GOPAL 132, GOPAL 60, GOPAL 40, GOPAL 24, 132 etc. (hereinafter GOPAL formative marks) with or without the Lord Krishna Device for tobacco related products including but not limited to chewing tobacco, zarda etc. The list of Plaintiff's GOPAL and GOPAL formative marks is enclosed herewith as Annexure C.
2. The Defendant further acknowledges the Plaintiff's rights in the packaging, get
The central legal point established in the judgment is the lawfulness of the Settlement Agreement and the parties' undertaking to remain bound by its terms.
The court's approval of the settlement agreement and the subsequent decree based on the terms of the agreement.
Voluntary settlement agreements can effectively resolve disputes and lead to the withdrawal of legal petitions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding nature of a settlement agreement reached between parties, which can lead to the court decreeing the suit in terms of the settlement and....
Settlement agreements can effectively resolve disputes in trademark infringement cases, allowing parties to acknowledge rights and agree on actions to prevent future violations.
Settlement agreements can be used to resolve disputes without delving into the merits of the case, and the court may decree the suit in terms of the settlement agreement.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the effectiveness of a settlement agreement in resolving a trademark infringement dispute and leading to a decree in favor of the aggrieved part....
The court has the authority to examine and decree a suit based on the terms of settlement between the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC.
The acknowledgment of proprietary rights in the trademark and copyright, and the lawful disposal of seized goods in accordance with environmental regulations.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
