RAJIV SHAKDHER, GIRISH KATHPALIA
Najmus Sehar – Appellant
Versus
Bombay Marcantile Coop Bank – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Girish Kathpalia, J. This appeal, brought under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 assails order dated 30.10.2021 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial)-05, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, whereby objection petition filed under Section 34 of the Act by the appellant were dismissed. Upon service of notice, the respondent no. 1 bank (claimant before the arbitral tribunal) entered appearance through counsel to oppose this appeal. But respondents no. 2 and 3 (the principal borrower and the successor of the now deceased co-guarantor before the arbitral tribunal) opted not to contest the appeal despite service of notice.
1.1. We heard learned counsel for the appellant and for the respondent no. 1 bank.
2. Briefly stated, circumstances leading to this appeal are as follows. On 14.10.1998, the present respondent no. 2 availed loan of Rs.2,90,000/- from the present respondent no. 1 co-operative bank for purchase of a new Ambassador car against hypothecation, for which the appellant and the now deceased father of the present respondent no. 3 stood guarantor. The present respondent no. 2 having turned defaulter, liability to repay the loan wit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.