SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4316

RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Kishan Lal @ Kartik – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Chandan Malik, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP, for the State with ACP Yashwant, P.S. Ambedkar Nagar.

ORDER

Rajnish Bhatnagar, J.

1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in case FIR No.524/2014, under Sections 302/307/148/120B IPC and Sections 25/27 Arms Act, registered at police station Ambedkar Nagar, Delhi.

2. In brief, the facts of the case are that vide DD No. 33A, a PCR call was received at police station Ambedkar Nagar and on reaching the spot of incident, it was informed that "an incident of firing and knife" took place in front of shop no. A-21, Madngir, New Delhi. After investigation, one motor cycle bearing no. DL9SY9417, Hero Honda Splender was found at the spot, there was blood in front of the shop and thereafter, injured was taken to the hospital. As per the MLC No. 442660/2014, he was declared to be brought dead by his relatives. On the statement of eye witness, namely, Ram Singh, the aforesaid FIR was got registered.

3. I have heard the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner, Ld. APP for the State and perused the Status Report filed by the State.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and is in judicial custody since 06.08.2014. He submitted that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top