SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4778

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Ravi Shekhar & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 3918 of 2023
Decided On : 04-07-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr.Nitesh Aman, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP, for the State with ASI Ajeet Singh, PS Jagat Puri and SI Ashok PS F. Bazar.

Courts have a duty to encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes, and if parties have voluntarily settled the matter without coercion, the court may quash related proceedings.

Headnote:

Settlement - Matrimonial Dispute - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13(B)(1) - Sections 498A/406/34 IPC - B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC 675; Yashpal Chaudhrani and Others vs. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and Another, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8179

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought quashing of FIR No. 101/2018 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, citing an amicable settlement reached with the respondent in a matrimonial dispute. The parties had solemnized their marriage on 16.04.2016, but due to discord, they were living separately. The petitioner agreed to pay a lump sum amount to the respondent and file a joint petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13(B)(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the parties had voluntarily settled the matter without any fear, force, or coercion, in line with the duty of courts to encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes. Consequently, the court quashed the FIR and related proceedings.

Issues: The main issue was whether the court should quash the FIR and proceedings arising from it, given the amicable settlement reached by the parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the principles established in B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana and Yashpal Chaudhrani and Others vs. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and Another to support the quashing of the FIR and proceedings, emphasizing the duty of courts to encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes.

Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR No. 101/2018 and consequent proceedings arising therefrom, disposing of the petition.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

CRL.M.A. 14760/2023 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

CRL.M.C. 3918/2023

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr. PC seeking quashing of FIR No. 101/2018 registered at PS Farsh Bazar under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC.

2. Briefly stated facts of the case that the marriage between the parties got solemnized on 16.04.2016 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. However, due to certain matrimonial discord and differences the parties are living separately since 24.10.2016. The present FIR was filed on the complaint of Respondent no.2/wife. There is no child born out of this wedlock.

3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the parties have reached on an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated 22.10.2022 at Family Court, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, on the following terms and conditions:

    "1. Whereas, the parties in pursuance of the above mentioned settlement agreement are willing and ready to severe their marital relationship.

    2. Parties hereby have mutually agreed to dissolve their marriage by filing a joint petition for divorce by way of mutual consent U/s 13 (B) (1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in the court of competent jurisdiction at New Delhi on/before or by 15/11/2022.

    3. It is agreed between the parties that after expiry of mandatory prescribed period of six (6) month or any other earlier, if any so permitted under the law/judicial pronouncement, they will file second motion as contemplated under the Hindu Marriage act 1955 or in any other law and both the parties shall cooperate in entire process of mutual consent divorce proceedings and shall duly appear before the Hon'ble court for recording of their respective statement as required in law for the first and second motion.

    4. It is agreed between the parties that the Petitioner (Husband) shall pay lump sum consideration of Rs.1150000/- (Eleven Lakhs Fifty Thousands only) to the respondent (wife) as full and final settlement (against the respondents' past present and future maintenance, permanent alimony, stridhan etc.) under the following manner in three installment.

    5. That petitioner (husband) will pay a sum of Rs,350000/- (Three Lakhs fifty thousands) In the form of DD to the respondent (wife) at the time of recording of statement of both the parties before the Hon'ble family courts under the first motion proceedings. First motion petition shall be prepared by petitioner.

    6. That the petitioner (Husband) shall pay Rs.400000/- (Four Lakhs.) to the respondent (wife) at the time of recording of statements of both the parties before the Hon'ble family court on under the second motion proceedings in the form of Demand Draft. Second motion petition shall be filled by both the parties within 30 days of expiry of mandatory cooling period of six month after completion of first motion or both the parties shall file an application for waiving of mandatory cooling period of six month after first motion. Second motion petition shall be prepared bay petitioner

    7. It is further agreed between the parties that the petitioner (Husband) shall pay Rs.400000/- (Four Lakhs) in the form of DD to the respondent (wife) at the time of quashing of FIR No 101/2018 U/S-498A/406/34IPC P.S Farsh Bazar Delhi in Hon'ble Delhi High Court within 30 days after second motion and respondent (Wife) shall cooperate and sign all the necessary affidavits and appear for statements and do the needful in quashing of said FIR. The FIR quashing shall be filed by Husband.

    8. The second party undertakes not to establish any future contact with the first party in any manner whatsoever from the date of signing of the present deed and only contact that shall be made between the parties shall be only with respect to the signing of divorce petitions and coordination of dates for appearance before the court.

    9. The parties also undertake not to interfere in each other's life directly or through family members, relatives o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top