SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Rakesh Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
National Highway Authority of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the Petitioner as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) with the following prayers:
"1. To issue a Writ/Order/Direction in nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ/Order/Direction, directing the Respondent to amend their contract forthwith and make them compliant with Rule 7 of National Highways Fees (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008.
2. Issue a Writ/Order/Direction in nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ/Order/Direction commanding and directing the Respondents to recover the additional money which has been earned by the Concessioners as a result of non-compliance of Rule 7 of National Highways Fees (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008 in the Respondent No. 1=s Contract.
3. Issue a Writ/Order/Direction in nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ/Order/Direction commanding and directing investigation by a specialized agency as to the persons who are benefited and/or are responsible for the non compliance of Rule 7 of National Highways Fees (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008, which has r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.