JUDGMENT

Gaurang Kanth, J.

1. The present Writ Petition has been preferred by the Petitioner under Article 226 and 227 of Constitution of India assailing the Award dated 26.05.2004 (`Impugned Award') passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court-II, New Delhi (`Labour Court') in I.D. No. 100/1998, titled as `Ekpal Singh v. Management of Central Warehousing Corporations'.

2. Vide the Impugned Award, the learned Labour Court decided the dispute, referred to it by the Central Government, in favour of the Respondent Workman and against the Petitioner Corporation. Learned Labour Court observed that the action of the Management of the Petitioner in terminating the service of the Respondent was not justified and thus, it directed the Petitioner to reinstate the Respondent from 20.08.1996 with 10% back wages.

3. During the pendency of the present Writ Petition, the unfortunate demise of Respondent took place on 07.12.2014. Legal heir of the Respondent was substituted in place of deceased Respondent vide order of this Court dated 09.07.2015.

BRIEF FACTS RELEVANT FOR ADJUDICATION OF PRESENT WRIT PETITION

4. It is the case of the Respondent