SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4891

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Pankaj Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 3424 of 2023, Cr.M.A. 12895 of 2023
Decided On : 18-07-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Kamal Bhardwaj and Mr. Deepak Jangra, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for the State with SI M.L. Meena, PS Sagarpur
Ms. Renu Sharma-R-2 in person.

The central legal point established is that cases arising from matrimonial differences can be put to a quietus through the exercise of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code if the parties have reached an amicable settlement, as held in relevant precedents.

Headnote:

Quashing of FIR - Matrimonial Dispute - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 482 - IPC, Section 341/498A/406 - Settlement agreement, exercise of inherent powers, amicable settlement, matrimonial differences, quietus of disputes

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought quashing of FIR No. 04/2012 under section 341/498A/406 IPC at PS Sagarpur, South West District, Delhi and all related proceedings, citing amicable settlement with the respondent after marital discord and divorce decree granted by the Family Court.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the parties had amicably settled their disputes and exercised inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to quash the non-compoundable offences, considering the nature of the offences and the amicable settlement between the parties.

Issues: The issues involved the exercise of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to quash non-compoundable offences arising from matrimonial differences and the validity of the amicable settlement between the parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that cases arising from matrimonial differences should be put to a quietus if the parties have reached an amicable settlement, citing relevant precedents. It considered the totality of facts and circumstances and granted the quashing of the FIR and related proceedings.

Final Decision: The court quashed FIR No. 04/2012 under section 341/498A/406 IPC at PS Sagarpur, South West District, Delhi and all related proceedings, and disposed of the present petition along with all pending applications.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr. PC seeking quashing of FIR No, 04/2012, dated 06/01/2012 registered under section 341/498A/406 IPC at PS Sagarpur, South West District, Delhi and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that Respondent no.2/complainant married petitioner no.1 on 22.02.2022, in accordance with the Hindu Rites and Ceremonies in Delhi. One child was born out of the said wedlock namely Tanishk. However, on account of temperamental differences and mental incompatibility, the parties started living separately on 23.11.2008 and instituted litigation against each other. He also submits that the chargesheet, in this case, has already been filed and the matter is pending before the Learned Trial Court.

3. Learned Counsel further submits that during the pendency of the proceedings, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably and in furtherance thereof they have entered into a settlement agreement dated 24.11.2021. As per the settlement it has been agreed between the parties that the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.32,00,000/- (Thirty-Two Lakhs Only) as a full and final settlement, Out of which Rs.27,00,00/- (Twenty-Seven Lakhs only) has been paid and today a demand draft bearing DD No. 514463 dated 17.07.2023 for the sum of Rs.5,00,000/- drawn on ICICI Bank has handed over to the respondent No.2.

4. Pursuant to the settlement, a mutual divorce petition was also filed and a decree of divorce was granted vide order dated 22.08.2022 passed by Learned MM. Vipin Kumar Rai, Family Court, Dwarka Court.

5. Furthermore, the Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that since the parties have resolved all their differences amicably, therefore, it would be in the interest of justice to quash FIR 04/2012 under section 341/498A/406 IPC at PS Sagarpur, South West District, Delhi and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.

6. I have gone through the settlement which has been placed on record dated 24.11.2021 The settlement agreement provides for the following terms and conditions:

    i) First Party shall pay a sum of INR 5,00,000/- (Five Lakh Rupees) to the Second Party in the form of Demand Draft at the time of signing the present MOU/Settlement Agreement against a separate receipt to this effect.

    ii) That it is mutually agreed that within 10 days of the execution of this Agreement, the Parties shall jointly file a petition for Divorce by Mutual Consent ("Fist Motion") in accordance with the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the appropriate court in Delhi.

    iii) That upon filing of the petition for Divorce by Mutual Consent, the Parties shall appear (physically/virtually) before the court on the given date of hearing and get their statements recorded ratifying and affirming the petition filed by them, so as to enable the court to pass an order on the First Motion.

    iv) It is further agreed that at the time of recording of statements of the Parties the Ld. Judge during the First Motion, the First Party shall make payment of INR 5,00,000/- (Five Lakh Rupees) to the Second Party vide Demand Draft against receipt.

    v) It is further agreed that the Fist Party shall pay a sum of INR 5,00,000/- (Five Lakh Rupees) to the Second Party in the form of Demand Draft at the time of filing of Quashing Petition for FIR No. 04/2012 registered at PS Sagarpur, New Delhi U/s 498A/406/341 IPC and its consequential proceedings in the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, against receipt.

    vi) That immediately upon expiry of the statutory cooling period as per the Hindi Marriage Act, 1955, the Parties herein shall jointly file a petition for the Second Motion as per the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 to seek a decree of divorce by mutual consent before the same court as First Motion.

    vii) That at the time of recording of the statements before the court during the Second Motion, the First Party shall make payment of INR 17,00,00

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top